liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Breath alcohol concentration determined with a new analyzer using free exhalation predicts almost precisely the arterial blood alcohol concentration
Show others and affiliations
2007 (English)In: Forensic Science International, ISSN 0379-0738, E-ISSN 1872-6283, Vol. 168, no 2-3, p. 200-207Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

A new breath alcohol (ethanol) analyzer has been developed, which allows free exhalation, standardizes measured exhaled alcohol concentration to fully saturated water vapor at a body temperature of 37 °C (43.95 mg/L) and includes a built-in self-calibration system. We evaluated the performance of this instrument by comparing standardized alcohol concentration in freely expired breath (BrAC) with arterial (ABAC) and venous (VBAC) blood alcohol concentrations in fifteen healthy volunteers who drank 0.6 g of alcohol per kg body weight. The precision (coefficient of variation, CV) of the analyzer based on in vivo duplicate measurements in all phases of the alcohol metabolism was 1.7%. The ABAC/BrAC ratio was 2251 ± 46 (mean ± S.D.) in the post-absorptive phase and the mean bias between ABAC and BrAC × 2251 was 0.0035 g/L with 95% limits of agreement of 0.033 and -0.026. The ABAC and BrAC × 2251 were highly correlated (r = 0.998, p < 0.001) and the regression relationship was ABAC = 0.00045 + 1.0069 × (BrAC × 2251) indicating excellent agreement and no fixed or proportional bias. In the absorption phase, ABAC exceeded BrAC × 2251 by at most 0.04 ± 0.03 g/L when tests were made at 10 min post-dosing (p < 0.05). The VBAC/BrAC ratio never stabilized and varied continuously between 1834 and 3259. There was a proportional bias between VBAC and BrAC × 2251 (ABAC) in the post-absorptive phase (p < 0.001). The pharmacokinetic analysis of the elimination rates of alcohol and times to zero BAC confirmed that BrAC × 2251 and ABAC agreed very well with each other, but not with VBAC (p < 0.001). We conclude that this new breath analyzer using free exhalation has a high precision for in vivo testing. The BrAC reflects very accurately ABAC in the post-absorption phase and substantially well in the absorption phase and thereby reflects the concentration of alcohol reaching the brain. Our findings highlight the magnitude of arterio-venous differences in alcohol concentration and support the use of breath alcohol analyzers as a stand-alone test for medical and legal purposes. © 2006 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2007. Vol. 168, no 2-3, p. 200-207
National Category
Medical and Health Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-40492DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2006.07.018Local ID: 53374OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-40492DiVA, id: diva2:261341
Available from: 2009-10-10 Created: 2009-10-10 Last updated: 2017-12-13

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records

Jones, A Wayne

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Jones, A Wayne
By organisation
Faculty of Health SciencesDivision of clinical chemistry
In the same journal
Forensic Science International
Medical and Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 77 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf