liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Attitudes on the use of priority tags
Östergötlands Läns Landsting, Center for Disaster Medicine and Traumatology, Centre for Teaching and Research in Disaster Medicine and Traumatology. Linköping University, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Surgery. Linköping University, Faculty of Health Sciences.
Linköping University, Faculty of Health Sciences. Linköping University, Department of Biomedicine and Surgery, Division of surgery. Östergötlands Läns Landsting, Center for Disaster Medicine and Traumatology, Centre for Teaching and Research in Disaster Medicine and Traumatology.
2007 (English)In: Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine, ISSN 1757-7241, Vol. 15, 71-73 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Prioritising of victims as well as the use of priority tags in different colours is an important part of all training in patient management at disasters and major incidents. The actual use of priority tags in incidents and disasters has so far not been systematically studied. The aim of this study was to demonstrate attitudes among researchers as well as prehospital personnel on the actual use of priority tags. In 38 KAMEDO reports issued by the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare describing major incidents and disasters from 1977-2004, we found no documentation on the use of priority tags. In a questionnaire to personnel within the prehospital medical system 133 (68%) replied that they only have used priority tags in training. 20 (10%) had used priority tags in a real accident/incident and 43 (21%) answered that they have never used priority tags. Reports from incidents should include the issues on the use of priority tags and clearly defi ned criteria on prioritising and labelling of patients at an incident/disaster, as well as in daily work, should be defi ned.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
London, UK: BioMed Central, 2007. Vol. 15, 71-73 p.
National Category
Medical and Health Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-40752Local ID: 54035OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-40752DiVA: diva2:261601
Available from: 2009-10-10 Created: 2009-10-10 Last updated: 2013-10-24Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Link to publication

Authority records BETA

Nilsson, Heléne

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Nilsson, Heléne
By organisation
Centre for Teaching and Research in Disaster Medicine and TraumatologySurgeryFaculty of Health SciencesDivision of surgery
In the same journal
Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine
Medical and Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 51 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf