liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Test position and reliability in measurements of dorsal neck muscle endurance
Linköping University, Department of Department of Health and Society, Division of Physiotherapy. Linköping University, Faculty of Health Sciences.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6075-4432
Linköping University, Department of Department of Health and Society, Division of Physiotherapy. Linköping University, Faculty of Health Sciences.
Linköping University, Department of Department of Health and Society, Division of Physiotherapy. Linköping University, Faculty of Health Sciences.
Linköping University, Department of Department of Health and Society, Division of Physiotherapy. Linköping University, Faculty of Health Sciences.
Show others and affiliations
2007 (English)In: Advances in Physiotherapy, ISSN 1403-8196, E-ISSN 1651-1948, Vol. 9, no 4, 181-189 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The aims of the study were to compare the relative electromyographic (EMG) activity of the extensor muscles at three different locations of the spine (cervical, thoracic and lumbar) during three different dorsal neck muscle endurance test procedures, in order to determine the procedure in which the dorsal neck muscles are maximally activated in asymptomatic individuals. The reliability for one of these test procedures was evaluated using an endurance test expressed in seconds in both healthy volunteers and patients with neck discomfort. Surface EMG activity of the spinal extensor muscles was acquired in three different locations during three different test procedures: the “extended neck lift”, and “straight neck lift” with light and heavy loads in 12 healthy volunteers. The “extended neck lift” was assessed for intra-rater reliability in 30 healthy volunteers and 10 patients with neck disorders and for inter-rater reliability in another 30 healthy volunteers and nine patients with neck disorders. EMG activation of the spinal extensor muscles was generally low. Only during the “extended neck lift” was there a slight tendency that cervical extensors were more activated compared with thoracic extensors. The reliability was good (ICC 0.80–0.94); however, the maximal intra-individual differences and the measurement error were large. The different test procedures used are comparable but there was a slight tendency for “the extended neck lift” to be a more selective measurement for the cervical extensors. The “extended neck lift” is reliable and could be appropriate for evaluating groups of patients.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2007. Vol. 9, no 4, 181-189 p.
National Category
Social Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-41121DOI: 10.1080/14038190701702058Local ID: 55223OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-41121DiVA: diva2:261971
Available from: 2009-10-10 Created: 2009-10-10 Last updated: 2015-03-24Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records BETA

Peolsson, AnneliHamp, CatarinaAlbinsson, Anna-KarinKvist, Joanna

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Peolsson, AnneliHamp, CatarinaAlbinsson, Anna-KarinKvist, Joanna
By organisation
Division of PhysiotherapyFaculty of Health Sciences
In the same journal
Advances in Physiotherapy
Social Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 165 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf