liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
General domain circumscription and its first-order reduction.
Linköping University, The Institute of Technology. Linköping University, Department of Computer and Information Science, KPLAB - Knowledge Processing Lab.
Linköping University, The Institute of Technology. Linköping University, Department of Computer and Information Science, KPLAB - Knowledge Processing Lab.
Linköping University, The Institute of Technology. Linköping University, Department of Computer and Information Science, KPLAB - Knowledge Processing Lab.
1996 (English)In: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Formal and Applied Practical Reasoning (FAPR) / [ed] Dov Gabbay, Hans Olbach, Springer Berlin/Heidelberg, 1996, p. 93-109Conference paper, Published paper (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

We first define general domain circumscription (GDC) and provide it with a semantics. GDC subsumes existing domain circumscription proposals in that it allows varying of arbitrary predicates, functions, or constants, to maximize the minimization of the domain of a theory We then show that for the class of semi-universal theories without function symbols, that the domain circumscription of such theories can be constructively reduced to logically equivalent first-order theories by using an extension of the DLS algorithm, previously proposed by the authors for reducing second-order formulas. We also isolate a class of domain circumscribed theories, such that any arbitrary second-order circumscription policy applied to these theories is guaranteed to be reducible to a logically equivalent first-order theory. In the case of semi-universal theories with functions and arbitrary theories which are not separated, we provide additional results, which although not guaranteed to provide reductions in all cases, do provide reductions in some cases. These results are based on the use of fixpoint reductions.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Springer Berlin/Heidelberg, 1996. p. 93-109
Series
Lecture Notes in Computer Science, ISSN 0302-9743 ; 1085
National Category
Computer Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-41447DOI: 10.1007/3-540-61313-7_65Local ID: 56653ISBN: 978-3-540-61313-8 (print)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-41447DiVA, id: diva2:262299
Available from: 2009-10-10 Created: 2009-10-10 Last updated: 2018-01-13

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records

Doherty, PatrickLukaszewicz, WitoldSzalas, Andrzej

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Doherty, PatrickLukaszewicz, WitoldSzalas, Andrzej
By organisation
The Institute of TechnologyKPLAB - Knowledge Processing Lab
Computer Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
isbn
urn-nbn
Total: 205 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf