liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Technopedagogies of mass-individualization: correspondence education in the mid twentieth century
Linköping University, The Tema Institute, Technology and Social Change. Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7206-2046
2008 (English)In: History & Technology, ISSN 0734-1512, E-ISSN 1477-2620, Vol. 24, no 3, p. 239-253Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

This article is about how technology and pedagogy is co-produced in correspondence education. Theoretically the article departs from post-Foucauldian studies of materiality, and uses the concept of dispositif to construct a framework that is inspired by Foucault, Deleuze, and Actor-Network Theory. Empirically, the article treats how the tension between educational thought on progressive individualism, scientific thinking, and automation was coproduced with technical artifacts in correspondence education during the 1930s, 1940s and 1950s. The author shows how this co-production led to a specific mode of organizing correspondence education that tried to accomplish individualization on an industrial basis, and that this mass-individualization built on a pedagogy of testing, recording, classification, and differentiation. In conclusion the article discusses how mass-individualization can be seen as an epitome of educational modernity-s aspiration for equality of educational opportunity and progressive thoughts on individually tailored education. Furthermore the author shows that the dispositif of mass-individualization is closely associated to today-s educational technology, and how today-s educational technology embodies the tension in mass-individualization.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2008. Vol. 24, no 3, p. 239-253
Keywords [en]
distance education, educational technology, history, technopedagogy, mass-individualization, dispositif, co-production
National Category
Peace and Conflict Studies Other Social Sciences not elsewhere specified Social Sciences Educational Sciences Technology and Environmental History History
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-42269DOI: 10.1080/07341510801900318Local ID: 62253OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-42269DiVA, id: diva2:263125
Available from: 2009-10-10 Created: 2009-10-10 Last updated: 2025-02-20
In thesis
1. Letters & Bytes: Sociotechnical Studies of Distance Education
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Letters & Bytes: Sociotechnical Studies of Distance Education
2009 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Alternative title[sv]
Brev och bytes : Sociotekniska studier av distansundervisning
Abstract [en]

This dissertation studies the social aspects of technology in distance education trough the lens of history – in the form of correspondence education – and a possible future – in the form of a project of technical standardization, Learning Objects. The studied cases form a reflexive tool that allows the present of distance education to be seen in perspective.

In the case of correspondence education, the dissertation shows how the mundane technologies of correspondence letters, grading-forms, answer-templates and self-tests create a specific mode of organizing distance education that bridges the rift between the two major trends in educational modernity: massification and individualization. This attempt brought with it specific consequences for the organization of correspondence education: educators tried to devise methods for individual instruction, but at the same time they tried to industrialize the production through the mass-production of instructional letters. Hence, particular identities and modes of organizing education and arose. The correspondence education cases are studied through conference proceedings and archive material.

The contemporary cases study the heterogeneous construction of technical standards for the exchange of distance education material between computer systems, so-called Learning Objects. Through these cases, the dissertation shows that Learning Objects are closely tied to a dream of economies of scale and a market for distance education material with particular epistemic and technical consequences. Furthermore, the cases show how the attempt to create economies of scale results in an object oriented and modular way of reusing educational material; and how this modularization leads to an objectified mode of handling knowledge with emphasis on atomization of knowledge, as well as the protection of intellectual property rights through DRM-Technology.  The contemporary cases are studied through technical standards and text-analysis.

Abstract [sv]

Denna avhandling är en sociologisk studie av distansutbildningsteknik. Denna studeras genom ett historiskt fall i form av korrespondensutbildning - och en möjlig framtid i form av lärobjekt, vilket är ett tekniskt standardiseringsprojekt. Båda fallen utgör ett reflexivt verktyg som gör det möjligt att se dagens distansutbildningi perspektiv.

När det gäller korrespondensundervisning, visar avhandlingen hur vardagliga tekniker i form av korrespondensbrev, berygsblanketter, svarsmallar och självtester skapade ett särskilt sätt att organisera undervisningen som sökte överbrygga klyftan mellan två stora trender i utbildningsmoderniteten: massifiering och individualisering. Detta försök förde med sig specifika konsekvenser för organiseringen av korrespondensundervisningen där skolorna försökte ta fram metoder för individuell undervisning, samtidigt som de försökte industrialisera undervisningen genom massproduktion av korrespondensbrev, därmed uppstod också särskilda identiteter och sätt att organisera utbildningen. Korrespondensundervisningen studeras genom konferensmaterial och arkivmaterial.

De samtida fallen studerar den heterogena konstruktionen av tekniska standarder för utbyte av distansutbildningsmaterial, så kallade lärobjekt, mellan datorsystem. Genom att studera lärobjekt visar avhandlingen att de är starkt kopplade till en dröm om stordriftsfördelar och en marknad för distansundervisningsmaterial med särskilda epistemiska och tekniska konsekvenser. Försöket att skapa stordriftsfördelar resulterar i ett objektorienterat och modulärt sätt att återanvända undervisningsmaterial. Denna modulering leder till ett objektifierat sätt att hantera kunskap med tonvikt på atomisering av kunskap och skydd av immateriella rättigheter genom digital rättighetsskyddsteknik Det samtida fallet studeras genom tekniska standarder och textanalys.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Linköping: Linköpings universitet, 2009. p. 186
Series
Linköping Studies in Arts and Science, ISSN 0282-9800 ; 498
Keywords
sociology of technology, distance education, education, history of education, correspondence education, Learning Objects, standardization, actor-network theory, associations, translation, dispositif, tekniksociologi, distansutbildning, utbildning, korrespondensundervisning, lärobjekt, standardisering, aktörsnätverks teori, översättning, associering, dispositif
National Category
Other Social Sciences not elsewhere specified Sociology Technology and Environmental History Pedagogy Information Systems
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-53620 (URN)978-91-7393-518-0 (ISBN)
Public defence
2009-12-18, Vallfarten, Linköpings universitet, Linköping, 10:15 (English)
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2010-02-03 Created: 2010-01-26 Last updated: 2025-02-11Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full texthttp://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/07341510801900318

Authority records

Lee, Francis

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Lee, Francis
By organisation
Technology and Social ChangeFaculty of Arts and Sciences
In the same journal
History & Technology
Peace and Conflict StudiesOther Social Sciences not elsewhere specifiedSocial SciencesEducational SciencesTechnology and Environmental HistoryHistory

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 461 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf