liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
User satisfaction with mobility assistive devices: An important element in the rehabilitation process
Linköping University, Faculty of Health Sciences. Linköping University, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Rehabilitation Medicine. Östergötlands Läns Landsting, Reconstruction Centre, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine UHL.
Linköping University, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Geriatric. Linköping University, Faculty of Health Sciences. Östergötlands Läns Landsting, Local Health Care Services in Central Östergötland, Department of Geriatric Medicine in Linköping.
2008 (English)In: Disability and Rehabilitation, ISSN 0963-8288, E-ISSN 1464-5165, Vol. 30, no 7, 551-558 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background. An assistive device often means an evident change in a person's ability, more easy to notice than the effects of most of other types of physiotherapy or occupational therapy intervention. In spite of this, there is very little evidence in this area. Purpose. The objective was to follow-up user satisfaction with and the use and usefulness of rollators and manual wheelchairs. The objective was also to determine any difference in satisfaction between users of the two different types of mobility assistive products. Methods. A random sample of 262 users participated in the study, 175 rollator users and 87 wheelchair users. The Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology - QUEST 2.0 and an additional questionnaire were used for data collection. Results. Overall satisfaction with both types of device was high and most clients reported use of their device on a daily basis. There was a difference in how the users estimated the usefulness and other characteristics as well as some service aspects related to prescription and use of the two types of device. Most users reported not having had any follow-up, however, most users had not experienced any need for one. Conclusions. A standardized follow-up will give rehabilitation professionals continuous and valuable information about the effect of and satisfaction with assistive devices.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2008. Vol. 30, no 7, 551-558 p.
National Category
Medical and Health Sciences
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-42278DOI: 10.1080/09638280701355777Local ID: 62333OAI: diva2:263134
Available from: 2009-10-10 Created: 2009-10-10 Last updated: 2014-06-04

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Samuelsson, KerstiWressle, Ewa
By organisation
Faculty of Health SciencesRehabilitation MedicineDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine UHLGeriatricDepartment of Geriatric Medicine in Linköping
In the same journal
Disability and Rehabilitation
Medical and Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 56 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link