liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Domestication of new technology in households
Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences. Linköping University, The Tema Institute, Technology and Social Change.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7694-7397
Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences. Linköping University, The Tema Institute, Technology and Social Change.
2008 (English)In: EASST/4S conference ¿Acting with Science, Technology and Medicine,2008, 2008Conference paper, Published paper (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

In this paper we will analyze how two energy related technologies have been domesticated in eight different households in Sweden. The first technology consists of solar collectors that are being combined with a bedrock storage system in Anneberg, a tenant-s area in Stockholm. With this system, solar energy produces both hot water and space heating. The other technology is an energy-visualizing prototype, the Power-Aware Cord, which is a redesigned power strip that glows with different intensities depending on the amount of electricity passing through it. Through interviews with households in Anneberg we found that they had different way to approach the special designed heating system. We categorised the households according to their main interest in the technology; economical, environmental or technological interests. We then use this categorisation to discuss how the prototype, the Power Aware Cord, was domesticated in the households. The area of interest concerning technology does influence the way people adopted and perceived new technology. The technologically interested households had easier to adopt and accept technology and show a large willingness to interact-and experiment with the technology. Using design to make it easier to understand a technology did not fit them as method. The ecological households approached technology in an accepting way but they did not interact with it, but left that to the experts. The economical interested household was most critical to the non-function of the heating system. That household did not relate the Power Aware Cord to the possibilities to reduce energy expenses, which on the other hand no other household did either.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2008.
Keyword [en]
Energy, domestication, technology, household
National Category
Social Sciences Interdisciplinary
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-42984Local ID: 70519OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-42984DiVA: diva2:263841
Available from: 2009-10-10 Created: 2009-10-10 Last updated: 2014-10-08

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Authority records BETA

Palm, JennyLöfström, Erica

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Palm, JennyLöfström, Erica
By organisation
Faculty of Arts and SciencesTechnology and Social Change
Social Sciences Interdisciplinary

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 107 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf