liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Rehabilitation benefits highly motivated patients: A six-year prospective cost-effectiveness study
Kronoberg County Council, Lund University.
Linköping University, Faculty of Health Sciences. Linköping University, Department of Medicine and Health Sciences, General Practice. Östergötlands Läns Landsting, Local Health Care Services in the West of Östergötland, Unit of Research and Development in Local Health Care, County of Östergötland.
Lund University.
2004 (English)In: International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, ISSN 0266-4623, Vol. 20, no 2, 214-221 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Objectives: To compare the six-year outcome of a multidisciplinary rehabilitation program with continued care within primary care in terms of health-related quality of life and cost-effectiveness. Furthermore, predictors of total costs to society were examined. Methods: A prospective, matched, controlled, six-year follow-up was designed. The study included 236 patients (42 men, 194 women) nineteen to sixty-one years of age with prolonged musculoskeletal disorders. The intervention comprised a four-week multidisciplinary rehabilitation and an active one-year follow-up based on a bio-psycho-social approach. The control group received continued care within primary care. The main outcome measures were quality of life measured using the Nottingham Health Profile, motivation identified by an interview and patient-specific total costs to society. Differences in mean costs between groups and cost-effectiveness were evaluated by applying nonparametric bootstrapping techniques. Results: Total costs per treated patient in the rehabilitation group and the control group were £43,464 (SD = 31,093) and £44,123 (SD = 33,333), respectively (p=.896). Multidisciplinary rehabilitation improved quality of life somewhat more cost-effectively. Motivation was revealed as a predictor of total costs. Conclusion: In the long-run, the evaluated multidisciplinary rehabilitation improved the highly motivated patients' quality of life most cost-effectively. The latently motivated patients may require rehabilitation, which is less intensive and with a longer duration, to improve their health in a whole-person perspective. The burden of prolonged musculoskeletal disorders to society was reaffirmed. Motivation could be a predictor of total costs, a factor which has to be taken into account in the examination procedure.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2004. Vol. 20, no 2, 214-221 p.
Keyword [en]
Cost-effectiveness analysis, Motivation, Musculoskeletal diseases, Primary care, Quality of life
National Category
Medical and Health Sciences
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-45804DOI: 10.1017/S0266462304000996OAI: diva2:266700
Available from: 2009-10-11 Created: 2009-10-11 Last updated: 2011-01-12

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Borgquist, Lars
By organisation
Faculty of Health SciencesGeneral PracticeUnit of Research and Development in Local Health Care, County of Östergötland
In the same journal
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
Medical and Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 30 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link