liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Attention to impact pathways in EISs of large dam projects
Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences. Linköping University, The Tema Institute.
2004 (English)In: Environmental impact assessment review, ISSN 0195-9255, Vol. 24, no 1, 59-87 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The importance of addressing cumulative environmental impacts in Environmental Impact Statements (EISs) of large development projects is increasingly underlined. However, cumulative impacts are generated through complex impact pathways, involving multiple root causes and lower and higher order effects, interlinked by cause-effect relationships. Consideration to potential impact pathways may thus be difficult without appropriate analytical methods, expertise, and supportive Environmental Impact Assessment guidelines and terms-of-references (TOR). This paper presents the results of an analysis of six EISs prepared for large dam projects between 1994 and 2001. The objective was to analyze if, how, and to what extent potential impact pathways involved in the generation of dam-related cumulative impacts have been addressed in the analyzed material. For this purpose, a theoretical framework was developed, which identifies four key root causes, their potential effects, and associated cause-effect relationships. The analysis revealed various shortcomings. Important imbalances were found in the degree of attention given to effects of different categories. Lower order effects received greater attention than higher order, and the potential effects of reservoir filling were more extensively attended to than those of flow blockage, storage, and regulation. Most importantly, little effort was made to carefully explain the potential impact pathways involved, root causes were often referred to in general terms only, and potential pathways leading up to an anticipated higher order effect or following upon an expected lower order effect were often inadequately addressed or ignored. Probable reasons for the discovered shortcomings are discussed and recommendations are presented for improving the World Bank EIA guidelines for large dam projects. © 2003 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2004. Vol. 24, no 1, 59-87 p.
Keyword [en]
Cumulative impact, Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), Impact pathway, Large dam project, River basin
National Category
Social Sciences
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-45841DOI: 10.1016/S0195-9255(03)00162-8OAI: diva2:266737
Available from: 2009-10-11 Created: 2009-10-11 Last updated: 2012-06-26
In thesis
1. Environmental considerations in the planning of large dam projects: a study on Environmental Impact Statements and the Southeastern Anatolia Project
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Environmental considerations in the planning of large dam projects: a study on Environmental Impact Statements and the Southeastern Anatolia Project
2003 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Large dam projects have played a key role in supporting societal development in the past and continue to be launched, primarily in developing countries. However, large dam projects also cause extensive environmental impacts in the river system, which may reduce the river system's capacity to provide goods, services, and other values apart from those generated by the project. The Environmental Impact Statement (ElS) has become a key instrument for enabling prevention, minimization, and mitigation of significant adverse environmental effects of major projects in early planning. The potential of EISs to support compromise building between conflicting interests is also increasingly recognized. In reality, the great potentials of the ElS are rarely fully utilized, which motivate further improvements.

This thesis has three main objectives, Le. (i) to examine the motives behind large dam projects, their impact on project planning, and some constraints for full project realization, (ii) to identify shortcomings in EISs and other project-related reports regarding the extent to and manner in which potential environmental effects of large dam projects are attended to, and (iii) to suggest measures for how to improve the capacity of EISs to support impact minimization and compromise building in project plarming and decision-making.

Based on a case study on the Southeastern Anatolia Project (GAP) in southeast Turkey, it was found that the objectives and planning of large dam projects can change significantly over time, in response to changes in the underlying ambitions and motives for development. While changes to the design may increase the dam's technical capacity to store water and generate hydropower, the actual potential to utilize its installed capacities during recurrent droughts may be limited. An increased scale and number ofdam project objectives may also lead to increased competition over the river water. Full realization of dam project objectives may be hampered by the climate and by growing water demands of competing uses. Moreover, an analysis of GAP-related reports revealed imbalances in the total degree of attention given to individual environmental problems, different categories of environmental problems, and to environmental problems of dam projects and irrigation schemes, respectively, as weIl as shifts in the focus of attention over time from early plarming to implementation. The fmdings suggest that project-related reports tend to focus on problematic environmental conditions that motivate project implementation, and on potential environmental effects that may undermine project productivity, viability, or longevity, particularly in planning and early implementation. In contrast, those potential environmental effects with no apparent bearing on the financial or operational success of the project tend to be largely neglected unless strong incentives are created.

The analysis ofEISs of large dam projects revealed shortcomings in the attention given to root causes and impact pathways involved in the generation of higher-order environmental effects and cumulative impacts. Important imbalances were also found in the degree of attention given to different types of environmental effects. In order to improve the capacity of EISs to explain how higher-order effects and cumulative impacts may arise, network analysis and cause-effect diagrams should be increasingly adopted. This thesis also proposes a conceptual framework to facilitate a comparison of desired and undesired effects, based on the view of a river system as a provider of goods and services, which enables the translation of ecological effects into their societal and economic implications.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Linköping: Linköping University Electronic Press, 2003. 76 p.
Linköping Studies in Arts and Science, ISSN 0282-9800 ; 272
Atatürk Dam. EIA, ecosystem services, environmental impact, Euphrates River, GAP, hydropower, river system, sustainable development, Tigris River, Turkey, Dammar, Miljöaspekter, Tigris, Turkiet
National Category
Social Sciences Interdisciplinary
urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-29569 (URN)14944 (Local ID)91-7373-649-X (ISBN)14944 (Archive number)14944 (OAI)
Public defence
2003-05-22, Elysion, Hus T, Campus Valla, Linköpings universitet, Linköping, 10:00 (English)
Available from: 2009-10-09 Created: 2009-10-09 Last updated: 2014-09-01Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Brismar, Anna
By organisation
Faculty of Arts and SciencesThe Tema Institute
In the same journal
Environmental impact assessment review
Social Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 139 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link