liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Detection of mild emphysema by computed tomography density measurements
Linköping University, The Institute of Technology. Linköping University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Medical Informatics.
Linköping University, The Institute of Technology. Linköping University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Medical Informatics.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9267-2191
Show others and affiliations
2005 (English)In: Acta Radiologica, ISSN 0284-1851, E-ISSN 1600-0455, Vol. 46, no 3, p. 237-245Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Purpose: To assess the ability of a conventional density mask method to detect mild emphysema by high- resolution computed tomography ( HRCT), to analyze factors influencing quantification of mild emphysema, and to validate a new algorithm for detection of mild emphysema. Material and Methods: Fifty- five healthy male smokers and 34 never- smokers, 61 - 62 years of age, were examined. Emphysema was evaluated visually, by the conventional density mask method, and by a new algorithm compensating for the effects of gravity and artifacts due to motion and the reconstruction algorithm. Effects of the reconstruction algorithm, slice thickness, and various threshold levels on the outcome of the density mask area were evaluated. Results: Forty- nine percent of the smokers had mild emphysema. The density mask area was higher the thinner the slice irrespective of the reconstruction algorithm and threshold level. The sharp algorithm resulted in increased density mask area. The new reconstruction algorithm could discriminate between smokers with and those without mild emphysema, whereas the density mask method could not. The diagnostic ability of the new algorithm was dependent on lung level. At about 90% specificity, sensitivity was 65 - 100% in the apical levels, but low in the rest of the lung. Conclusion: The conventional density mask method is inadequate for detecting mild emphysema, while the new algorithm improves the diagnostic ability but is nevertheless still imperfect.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2005. Vol. 46, no 3, p. 237-245
Keywords [en]
computed tomography, computerized quantification, emphysema, validation
National Category
Engineering and Technology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-46113DOI: 10.1080/02841850510021012OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-46113DiVA, id: diva2:267009
Available from: 2009-10-11 Created: 2009-10-11 Last updated: 2017-12-13

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records

Friman, OlaBorga, Magnus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Friman, OlaBorga, Magnus
By organisation
The Institute of TechnologyMedical Informatics
In the same journal
Acta Radiologica
Engineering and Technology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 594 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf