liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Effects of losartan and captopril on left ventricular systolic and diastolic function after acute myocardial infarction: Results of the Optimal Trial in Myocardial Infarction with Angiotensin II Antagonist Losartan (OPTIMAAL) echocardiographic substudy
Linköping University, Faculty of Health Sciences. Linköping University, Department of Medicine and Health Sciences, Cardiology . Östergötlands Läns Landsting, Heart Centre, Department of Cardiology.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6353-8041
Show others and affiliations
2004 (English)In: American Heart Journal, ISSN 0002-8703, Vol. 147, no 3, 494-501 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors have been shown to attenuate adverse remodeling after acute myocardial infarction (AMI), and the same has been suggested for angiotensin 11 type I receptor antagonists in animal models. Therefore the aim of the study was to compare the effects of losartan and captopril on regional systolic, diastolic, and overall left ventricular (LV) function after AMI. Methods Two hundred twenty-five patients aged 50 years with documented AMI and heart failure and/or LV dysfunction were randomly assigned treatment with either losartan (50 mg/d) or captopril (50 mg 3 times/d). Echocardiography was performed at randomization and after 3 months, echocardiograms were analyzed blinded at the core laboratory. Main outcome measures were changes in wall motion score index (WMSI), E-wave deceleration time (E-DT), and Tei index of overall LV function. Results WMSI decreased in both groups (losartan 1.58 +/- 0.23 to 1.52 +/- 0.26, P = .009, captopril 1.60 +/- 0.24 to 1.48 +/- 0.22, P < .001), although the decrease was greater in patients allocated to captopril (captopril -0.12 &PLUSMN, 0.17 vs losartan -0.05 &PLUSMN, 0.19, P = .007). In both groups E-DT increased, although the increase was significant only in patients treated with captoril (193 &PLUSMN, 61 ms to 208 &PLUSMN, 70 ms, P = .05). The change in E-DT was not different between treatment groups (captopril 14 &PLUSMN, 74 ms vs losartan 7 &PLUSMN, 80 ms, P = .52). Tei index decreased in both groups (losartan 0.59 &PLUSMN, 0.13 to 0.55 &PLUSMN, 0.15, P = .04, captopril 0.62 &PLUSMN, 0.15 to 0.55 &PLUSMN, 0.13, P < .001). However, the reduction was significantly greater in patients treated with captopril (captopril -0.08 +/- 0.14 vs losartan -0.03 +/- 0.14, P = .01). Conclusion Losartan and captopril improve systolic and overall IV function after AMI, but the benefit is greater for patients treated with captopril.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2004. Vol. 147, no 3, 494-501 p.
National Category
Medical and Health Sciences
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-46254DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2003.10.031OAI: diva2:267150
Available from: 2009-10-11 Created: 2009-10-11 Last updated: 2013-09-26

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Dahlström, Ulf
By organisation
Faculty of Health SciencesCardiology Department of Cardiology
In the same journal
American Heart Journal
Medical and Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 7 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link