liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
An integrated framework for information-centred human-machine systems analysis
Swedish Defence Research Agency, PO Box 1165, SE-581 11 Linkoping, Sweden.
2003 (English)In: International Journal of Emergency Management, ISSN 1471-4825, E-ISSN 1741-5071, Vol. 1, no 2, 125-143 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

In emergency management operators and commanders must rely on dynamic, distributed systems and organisations for safe and effective mission accomplishment. Commanders and operators often experience extreme risk exposure, and coping with environmental hazards, fear, exhaustion and compulsion is part of their profession. They routinely handle highly ambiguous decision situations, where critical demands are inflicted upon their cognitive abilities and response times. In the future they will make decisions in situations where operational and system characteristics are highly dynamic and nonlinear, i.e. small actions or decisions may have serious and irreversible consequences for the entire mission. Commanders and operators are required to manage true real-time system properties at all levels, individual operators, stand-alone technical systems, higher-order integrated sociotechnical systems and joint operations forces alike. Coping with these conditions in performance assessment, system development and operational testing is a challenge for practitioners, instructors and researchers. Using a monotheory approach such as classic decision theory and multiattribute utility theory is nearly impossible. New results, new measurement techniques and new methodological breakthroughs facilitate a more accurate and deeper understanding, generating new and updated models and paradigms. This in turn generates theoretical advances. Some good examples of successful polytheory approaches are found in the research areas of cognitive systems engineering, systems theory, and psychophysiology, and in the fields of dynamic, distributed decision making and naturalistic decision making. A successful attempt to integrate these areas into a coherent framework, Action Control Theory (ACT) is described. Copyright © 2002 Inderscience Enterprises Ltd.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2003. Vol. 1, no 2, 125-143 p.
Keyword [en]
Analysis, Emergency management, Human-machine systems engineering
National Category
Natural Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-46376DOI: 10.1504/IJEM.2002.000515OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-46376DiVA: diva2:267272
Available from: 2009-10-11 Created: 2009-10-11 Last updated: 2017-12-13

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text
In the same journal
International Journal of Emergency Management
Natural Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 16 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf