liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Osteotome sinus floor elevation and simultaneous placement of implants - A 1-year retrospective study with astra tech implants
Fermergård, R., Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Västervik Hospital, Västervik, Sweden, Department Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Västervik Hospital, SE-593 81 Västervik, Sweden.
Linköping University, Faculty of Health Sciences. Linköping University, Department of Neuroscience and Locomotion, Dental Clinic.
2008 (English)In: Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, ISSN 1523-0899, E-ISSN 1708-8208, Vol. 10, no 1, p. 62-69Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background: The bone support for implants in the posterior part of the maxilla is often poor. This condition may be treated with augmentation of the maxillary sinus floor. The most common technique used is to elevate the sinus floor by inserting a bone graft through a window opened in the lateral antral wall, although less invasive techniques with osteotomes have been used since 1994. Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcome of implants placed in the posterior maxilla with the osteotome sinus floor elevation (OSFE) technique without grafting. Materials and Methods: The study population comprised 36 consecutive patients in whom 53 implants were inserted with the OSFE technique. The indication for sinus floor elevation was that the bone height below the maxillary sinus was considered to be 10 mm or less. Results: The mean height of the alveolar process in the intended implant sites was 6.3 ± 0.3 mm, and the mean elevation of the sinus floor was 4.4 ± 0.2 mm. At the 1-year follow-up, two implants had been lost, both in edentulous patients. The remaining 51 implants inserted were in function, giving a 1-year cumulative survival rate of 96%. Implants used in single-tooth replacements and in partially edentulous cases had a 100% survival rate. The mean marginal bone level at the time of loading of the implants was 0.1 ± 0.04 mm below the reference point. One year later, the corresponding value was 0.5 ± 0.06 mm. The mean bone loss between the two examinations was 0.4 ± 0.05 mm. Conclusions: The OSFE technique, without bone grafts, was found to produce predictable results in the treatment of 36 patients with restricted bone volume in the posterior part of the maxilla. © 2007, Blackwell Publishing.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2008. Vol. 10, no 1, p. 62-69
Keywords [en]
Astra Tech implants, Dental implants, Osteotome, Posterior maxilla, Sinus floor elevation
National Category
Medical and Health Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-46711DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2007.00062.xOAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-46711DiVA, id: diva2:267607
Available from: 2009-10-11 Created: 2009-10-11 Last updated: 2017-12-13

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records

Åstrand, Per

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Åstrand, Per
By organisation
Faculty of Health SciencesDental Clinic
In the same journal
Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research
Medical and Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 137 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf