liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
L2 Model Reduction and Variance Reduction
Linköping University, Department of Electrical Engineering, Automatic Control. Linköping University, The Institute of Technology.
Linköping University, Department of Electrical Engineering, Automatic Control. Linköping University, The Institute of Technology.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4881-8955
2002 (English)In: Automatica, ISSN 0005-1098, E-ISSN 1873-2836, Vol. 38, no 9, p. 1517-1530Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

In this contribution we examine certain variance properties of model reduction. The focus is on L2 model reduction, but some general results are also presented. These general results can be used to analyze various other model reduction schemes. The models we study are finite impulse response (FIR) and output error (OE) models. We compare the variance of two estimated models. The first one is estimated directly from data and the other one is computed by reducing a high order model, by L2 model reduction. In the FIR case we show that it is never better to estimate the model directly from data, compared to estimating it via L2 model reduction of a high order FIR model. For OE models we show that the reduced model has the same variance as the directly estimated one if the reduced model class used contains the true system.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier, 2002. Vol. 38, no 9, p. 1517-1530
Keywords [en]
Identification, Model reduction, Variance reduction
National Category
Control Engineering
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-46912DOI: 10.1016/S0005-1098(02)00066-3OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-46912DiVA, id: diva2:267808
Conference
12th IFAC Symposium on System Identification, Santa Barbara, CA, USA, 21-23 June, 2000
Note

© 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

Proceedings of the 12th IFAC Symposium on System Identification, New York, USA: Pergamon Press, 2000, s. 1517-1530

ISBN: 9780080435459 (print)

Available from: 2009-10-11 Created: 2009-10-11 Last updated: 2024-09-04
In thesis
1. Variance Expressions and Model Reduction in System Identification
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Variance Expressions and Model Reduction in System Identification
2002 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Although system identification is now a mature research field, some problems remain unsolved. Examples of unsolved or partly unsolved problems are; accuracy of subspace identification algorithms, identification via model reduction, identification for control, and identification of non-linear systems. Some problems that fall into these categories are studied in this thesis.

This thesis discusses variance expressions in system identification. In particular, variance expressions for reduced models are analyzed.

The topic of model reduction via system identification has received little attention during the years. To understand how the variance of a high order model affects the reduced model, a general expression for the variance of the low order model as a function of the reduction method used is derived. This allows the analysis of all model reduction methods that can be written as a minimization criterion, where the function to be minimized is twice continuously differentiable. Many methods can be studied using this approach. However, the popular method of model reduction by balanced truncation of states does not immediately fit into this framework.

Many unsolved problems in system identification may be studied with the use of bootstrap methods. This statistical tool, used to assess accuracy in estimation problems, may be adopted to a series of problems in system identification and signal processing. The thesis presents how bootstrap can be adopted in the prediction error framework. In addition, we demonstrate how bootstrap can be applied to problems of constructing condence regions with a simultaneous confidence degree and calculating the variance of undermodeled models.

The thesis briefly discusses how set membership identification and prediction error identification can be combined into a more robust estimate. Finally, insights into how model validation can be performed in a more user informative way are also given.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Linköping: Linköping University, 2002. p. 192
Series
Linköping Studies in Science and Technology. Dissertations, ISSN 0345-7524 ; 730
National Category
Control Engineering
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-98162 (URN)91-7373-253-2 (ISBN)
Public defence
2002-02-22, Visionen, Hus B, Campus Valla, Linköpings universitet, Linköping, 10:15 (English)
Supervisors
Available from: 2013-10-09 Created: 2013-09-30 Last updated: 2024-01-08Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textRelated report

Authority records

Tjernström, FredrikLjung, Lennart

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Tjernström, FredrikLjung, Lennart
By organisation
Automatic ControlThe Institute of Technology
In the same journal
Automatica
Control Engineering

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 146 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf