liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
On the retrieving of forest stem volume from VHF SAR data: Observation and modeling
Centre d'Etudes Spatiales de la Biosphère (CESBIO), Toulouse, France.
Centre d'Etudes Spatiales de la Biosphère (CESBIO), Toulouse, France.
Le Toan, T., Centre d'Etudes Spatiales de la Biosphère (CESBIO), Toulouse, France.
Show others and affiliations
2001 (English)In: IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, ISSN 0196-2892, E-ISSN 1558-0644, Vol. 39, no 11, p. 2364-2372Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The objective of this paper is to investigate the relationships between VHF data and forest biomass using data acquired by the Airborne Imaging Radar CARABAS over two different pine plantation forests in southern France. Data are analyzed using detailed ground truth measurements available on both sites. The backscattering coefficient is strongly correlated to characteristics of the tree trunk. Signal saturation is not observed up to 900 m3/ha. However, the sensitivity to the volume is high in the range of 0-500 M3/ha (e.g., 1 to 1.5 dB for 50 m3/ha), whereas it is reduced beyond 500 m3/ha (< 0.5 dB for 50 m3/ha). The experimental analysis is supported by theoretical modeling using a coherent backscatter model based on the distorted Born approximation coupled with a tree growth model giving a fine and precise description of the trees at both sites. The modeling results show that the trunk is the main scatterer, but that, when the branch dimensions are not insignificant compared to trunk dimension, branch scattering needs to be accounted for. However, since the two species under study are both coniferous, branch dimensions are relatively small compared to trunk dimension. This explains no significant differences observed in the backscatter behavior between both sites, except for mature stands with low stem density. Finally, the effect of topography is investegated both experimentally, using using a digital elevation model (DEM), and theoretically with the coherent model. The loss of sensitivity to stem volume due to slope is clearly demonstrated and explained by the decrease of the dihedral trunk-ground interaction as the slope increases.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2001. Vol. 39, no 11, p. 2364-2372
National Category
Natural Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-47234DOI: 10.1109/36.964972OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-47234DiVA, id: diva2:268130
Available from: 2009-10-11 Created: 2009-10-11 Last updated: 2017-12-13

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full text
In the same journal
IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing
Natural Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 34 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf