Qualifying the arguments used in the derivation of the revised Kubelka-Munk theory: reply
2007 (English)In: JOURNAL OF THE OPTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA A-OPTICS IMAGE SCIENCE AND VISION, ISSN 1084-7529, Vol. 24, no 2, 557-560 p.Other (Other academic)
The fundamental assumptions made in the revised Kubelka-Munk (KM) model of light propagation in scattering and absorptive media, recently proposed [J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 21, 1942 (2004), 22, 866 (2005)], are critically reviewed and analyzed. The authors argue that the model, now questioned by Edstrom [J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 24, 548 (2007)] is well founded on physical grounds and consistent with the original KM model, which has been the cornerstone of light propagation studies and utilized for more than half a century. (c) 2007 Optical Society of America
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2007. Vol. 24, no 2, 557-560 p.
Engineering and Technology
IdentifiersURN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-48037OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-48037DiVA: diva2:268933