liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Pharmacological treatment and perceived health status during 1-year follow up in patients diagnosed with coronary artery disease, but ineligible for revascularization. Results from the Euro Heart Survey on Coronary Revascularization
Department of Cardiology, Clinical Epidemiology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Scholte op Reimer, W., Department of Cardiology, Clinical Epidemiology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands, Undertaking Nursing Intervention Throughout Europe (UNITE) Research Group.
Norekvål, T.M., Undertaking Nursing Intervention Throughout Europe (UNITE) Research Group, Department of Heart Disease, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
De Geest, S., Undertaking Nursing Intervention Throughout Europe (UNITE) Research Group, Institute of Nursing Science University of Basel, Clinical Nursing Science University Hospital Basel, Switzerland.
Show others and affiliations
2006 (English)In: European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, ISSN 1474-5151, Vol. 5, no 2, 115-121 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background: It has been recognized that a clinically significant portion of patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) continue to experience anginal and other related symptoms that are refractory to the combination of medical therapy and revascularization. The Euro Heart Survey on Revascularization (EHSCR) provided an opportunity to assess pharmacological treatment and outcome in patients with proven CAD who were ineligible for revascularization. Methods: We performed a secondary analysis of EHS-CR data. After excluding patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction and those in whom revascularization was not indicated, 4409 patients remained in the analyses. We selected two groups: (1) patients in whom revascularization was the preferred treatment option (n = 3777, 86%), and (2) patients who were considered ineligible for revascularization (n = 632, 14%). Results: Patient ineligible for revascularization had a worse risk profile, more often had a total occlusion (59% vs. 37%, p < 0.001), were treated more often with ACE-inhibitors (65% vs. 55%, p < 0.001) but less likely with aspirin (83% vs. 88%, p < 0.001). Overall, they had higher case-fatality at 1-year (7.0% vs. 3.7%, p < 0.001). Regarding self-perceived health status, measured via the EuroQol 5D (EQ-5D) questionnaire, these same patients reported more problems on all dimensions of the EQ-5D. Furthermore, in the revascularization group we observed an increase between discharge and 1-year follow up (utility score from 0.85 to 1.00) whereas patients ineligible for revascularization did not improve over time (utility score remained 0.80). Conclusion: In this large cohort of European patients with CAD, those considered ineligible for revascularization had more co-morbidities and risk factors, and scored worse on self-perceived health status as compared to revascularized patients in the revascularization group. With the exception of ACE-inhibitors and aspirin, there were no major differences regarding drug treatment between the two groups. Given these clinically significant observations, there appears to be a role for nurse-led, multidisciplinary, rehabilitation teams that target clinically vulnerable patients whose symptoms remain refractory to standard medical care. © 2006 European Society of Cardiology.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2006. Vol. 5, no 2, 115-121 p.
Keyword [en]
Chronic refractory angina, Euro Heart Survey, Health status, Treatment
National Category
Medical and Health Sciences
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-48044DOI: 10.1016/j.ejcnurse.2006.01.003OAI: diva2:268940
Available from: 2009-10-11 Created: 2009-10-11 Last updated: 2013-09-03

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Strömberg, Anna
By organisation
Faculty of Health SciencesNursing ScienceDepartment of Cardiology
In the same journal
European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing
Medical and Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 24 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link