liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
How issues become (re)constructed in the media: Discursive practices in the AstraZeneca merger
Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences. Linköping University, Department of Management and Engineering, Business Administration .
Lappeenranta Univ Technol, Dept Business Adm, Lappeenranta 53851, Finland Linkoping Univ, S-58183 Linkoping, Sweden Stockholm Sch Econ, S-11383 Stockholm, Sweden Helsinki Sch Econ, Helsinki, Finland.
Lappeenranta Univ Technol, Dept Business Adm, Lappeenranta 53851, Finland Linkoping Univ, S-58183 Linkoping, Sweden Stockholm Sch Econ, S-11383 Stockholm, Sweden Helsinki Sch Econ, Helsinki, Finland.
Lappeenranta Univ Technol, Dept Business Adm, Lappeenranta 53851, Finland Linkoping Univ, S-58183 Linkoping, Sweden Stockholm Sch Econ, S-11383 Stockholm, Sweden Helsinki Sch Econ, Helsinki, Finland.
Show others and affiliations
2002 (English)In: British Journal of Management, ISSN 1045-3172, E-ISSN 1467-8551, Vol. 13, no 2, 123-140 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

In this article, we put forward a novel way of exploring difference and contradiction in merging organizations. We examine how the media (re)constructs meanings in a major cross-border merger. Based on an analysis of press coverage, we attempt to specify and illustrate how particular issues are (re)constructed in media texts through interpretations of 'winning' and 'losing'. We also show how specific discourses are drawn on in this (re)construction. In the merger studied, discourse based on economic and financial rationale dominated the media coverage. Discourse promoting nationalistic sentiments, however, provided an alternative discursive frame to the dominant rationalistic discourse. We argue that the two basic discourses are enacted in three analytically distinct discursive practices in the media: factualizing, rationalizing and emotionalizing. We suggest that the ability of different actors such as top managers to make use of different discursive strategies and resources in promoting their 'versions of reality' in the media (or public discussion) is a crucial avenue for research in this area.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2002. Vol. 13, no 2, 123-140 p.
National Category
Social Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-48841OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-48841DiVA: diva2:269737
Available from: 2009-10-11 Created: 2009-10-11 Last updated: 2017-12-12

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Authority records BETA

Hellgren, Bo

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Hellgren, Bo
By organisation
Faculty of Arts and SciencesBusiness Administration
In the same journal
British Journal of Management
Social Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 69 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf