liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Comparison of electron paramagnetic resonance methods to determine distances between spin labels on human carbonic anhydrase II
Linköping University, The Institute of Technology. Linköping University, Department of Physics, Chemistry and Biology.
Univ Denver, Dept Chem & Biochem, Denver, CO 80208 USA Linkoping Univ, Dept Chem, IFM, SE-58183 Linkoping, Sweden.
Linköping University, The Institute of Technology. Linköping University, Department of Physics, Chemistry and Biology, Biochemistry.
Univ Denver, Dept Chem & Biochem, Denver, CO 80208 USA Linkoping Univ, Dept Chem, IFM, SE-58183 Linkoping, Sweden.
Show others and affiliations
2001 (English)In: Biophysical Journal, ISSN 0006-3495, E-ISSN 1542-0086, Vol. 80, no 6, 2886-2897 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Four doubly spin-labeled variants of human carbonic anhydrase II and corresponding singly labeled variants were prepared by site-directed spin labeling. The distances between the spin labels were obtained from continuous-wave electron paramagnetic resonance spectra by analysis of the relative intensity of the half-field transition, Fourier deconvolution of line-shape broadening, and computer simulation of line-shape changes. Distances also were determined by four-pulse double electron-electron resonance. For each variant, at least two methods were applicable and reasonable agreement between methods was obtained. Distances ranged from 7 to 24 W. The doubly spin-labeled samples contained some singly labeled protein due to incomplete labeling. The sensitivity of each of the distance determination methods to the noninteracting component was compared.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2001. Vol. 80, no 6, 2886-2897 p.
National Category
Engineering and Technology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-49243OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-49243DiVA: diva2:270139
Available from: 2009-10-11 Created: 2009-10-11 Last updated: 2017-12-12

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Authority records BETA

Persson, MalinHammarström, PerMårtensson, Lars-GöranCarlsson, Uno

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Persson, MalinHammarström, PerMårtensson, Lars-GöranCarlsson, Uno
By organisation
The Institute of TechnologyDepartment of Physics, Chemistry and BiologyBiochemistry
In the same journal
Biophysical Journal
Engineering and Technology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 179 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf