liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Stroke severity, early recovery and outcome are each related with clinical classification of stroke: Data from the 'Tinzaparin in Acute Ischaemic Stroke Trial' (TAIST)
Institute of Neuroscience, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Institute of Neuroscience, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Institute of Neuroscience, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Lindenstrøm, E., Leo Pharma A/S, Ballerup, Denmark.
Show others and affiliations
2007 (English)In: Journal of the Neurological Sciences, ISSN 0022-510X, Vol. 254, no 1-2, 54-59 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Introduction: Baseline severity and clinical stroke syndrome (Oxford Community Stroke Project, OCSP) classification are predictors of outcome in stroke. We used data from the 'Tinzaparin in Acute Ischaemic Stroke Trial' (TAIST) to assess the relationship between stroke severity, early recovery, outcome and OCSP syndrome. Methods: TAIST was a randomised controlled trial assessing the safety and efficacy of tinzaparin versus aspirin in 1484 patients with acute ischaemic stroke. Severity was measured as the Scandinavian Neurological Stroke Scale (SNSS) at baseline and days 4, 7 and 10, and baseline OCSP clinical classification recorded: total anterior circulation infarct (TACI), partial anterior circulation infarct (PACI), lacunar infarct (LACI) and posterior circulation infarction (POCI). Recovery was calculated as change in SNSS from baseline at day 4 and 10. The relationship between stroke syndrome and SNSS at days 4 and 10, and outcome (modified Rankin Scale at 90 days) were assessed. Results: Stroke severity was significantly different between TACI (most severe) and LACI (mildest) at all four time points (p < 0.001), with no difference between PACI and POCI. The largest change in SNSS score occurred between baseline and day 4, improvement was least in TACI (median 2 units), compared to other groups (median 3 units) (p < 0.001). If SNSS did not improve by day 4, then early recovery and late functional outcome tended to be limited irrespective of clinical syndrome (SNSS, baseline: 31, day 10: 32, mRS, day 90: 4), patients who recovered early tended to continue to improve and had better functional outcome irrespective of syndrome (SNSS, baseline: 35, day 10: 50, mRS, day 90: 2). Conclusions: Although functional outcome is related to baseline clinical syndrome (best with LACI, worst with TACI), patients who improve early have a more favourable functional outcome, irrespective of their OCSP syndrome. Hence, patients with a TACI syndrome may still achieve a reasonable outcome if early recovery occurs. © 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2007. Vol. 254, no 1-2, 54-59 p.
Keyword [en]
Acute stroke, Clinical classification, Functional outcome, Ischaemic stroke, Recovery
National Category
Medical and Health Sciences
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-49957DOI: 10.1016/j.jns.2006.12.016OAI: diva2:270853
Available from: 2009-10-11 Created: 2009-10-11 Last updated: 2011-01-11

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Olsson, Jan-Edvin
By organisation
Faculty of Health SciencesNeurology Department of Neurology
In the same journal
Journal of the Neurological Sciences
Medical and Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 22 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link