liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Long-term stability of orthodontic treatment and patient satisfaction: A systematic review
Faculty of Odontology, Malmoe University, Department of Orthodontics, Malmoe, Sweden, Faculty of Odontology, Malmoe University, Department of Orthodontics, Carl Gustavs väg 34, Scania SE-20506 Malmoe, Sweden.
Umeå University, Department of Odontology, Pediatric Dentistry, Umeå, Sweden.
University of Gothenburg, Department of Orthodontics, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Swedish Council on Technology Assessment in Health Care, Stockholm, Sweden.
Show others and affiliations
2007 (English)In: Angle orthodontist, ISSN 0003-3219, Vol. 77, no 1, 181-191 p.Article, review/survey (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Objective: To evaluate morphologic stability and patient satisfaction at least 5 years after orthodontic treatment. Materials and Methods: Published literature was searched through the PubMed and Cochrane Library electronic databases from 1966 to January 2005. The search was performed by an information specialist at the Swedish Council on Technology Assessment in Health Care. The inclusion criteria consisted of a follow-up period of at least 5 years postretention, randomized clinical trials, prospective or retrospective clinical controlled studies, and cohort studies, and orthodontic treatment including fixed or removable appliances, selective grinding, or extractions. Two reviewers extracted the data independently and also assessed the quality of the studies. Results: The search strategy resulted in 1004 abstracts or full-text articles, of which 38 met the inclusion criteria. Treatment of crowding resulted in successful dental alignment. However, the mandibular arch length and width gradually decreased, and crowding of the lower anterior teeth reoccurred postretention. This condition was unpredictable at the individual level (limited evidence). Treatment of Angle Class II division 1 malocclusion with Herbst appliance normalized the occlusion. Relapse occurred but could not be predicted at the individual level (limited evidence). The scientific evidence was insufficient for conclusions on treatment of cross-bite, Angle Class III, open bite, and various other malocclusions as well as on patient satisfaction in a long-term perspective. Conclusions: This review has exposed the difficulties in drawing meaningful evidence-based conclusions often because of the inherent problems of retrospective and uncontrolled study design. © 2006 by The EH Angle Education and Research Foundation, Inc.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2007. Vol. 77, no 1, 181-191 p.
Keyword [en]
Long-term stability, Orthodontic treatment results, Patient satisfaction, Systematic review
National Category
Medical and Health Sciences
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-50021DOI: 10.2319/011006-16R.1OAI: diva2:270917
Available from: 2009-10-11 Created: 2009-10-11 Last updated: 2011-01-11

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Paulin, Gunnar
By organisation
Faculty of Health SciencesDental Clinic
In the same journal
Angle orthodontist
Medical and Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 37 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link