liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Testing a Scandinavian biodiversity assessment tool in an African desert environment
EnviroScience, P.O. Box 1722, Oranjemund, Namibia.
Kyläkorpi, L., Vattenfall AB, Generation Nordic, 162 87 Stockholm, Sweden.
Vattenfall Power Consultant AB, P.O. Box 1842, 58117 Linkoping, Sweden.
Rössing Uranium, P/Bag 5005, Swakopmund, Namibia.
2008 (English)In: Environmental Management, ISSN 0364-152X, E-ISSN 1432-1009, Vol. 42, no 4, 698-706 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Life cycle assessment-based environmental product declarations (EPDs) require the inclusion of biodiversity impacts across the entire supply chain. The objective of this study is to test the applicability of a Scandinavian biodiversity assessment tool, developed specifically for use with EPD applications, in an African desert environment, linking the industry types power generation and mining. For this purpose, a GIS-based spatial analysis tool-the biotope method-was adapted to a framework approach which allowed the selection of more suitable, site-specific biodiversity indicators. The biotope method provides a step-by-step process of defining system boundaries, mapping biotopes, categorizing biotopes based on site-specific indicators, and evaluating change in biotope status "before" and "after" the impact. The development of site-specific indicators was piloted in this study and determined by the affected ecosystem and the status of knowledge on biodiversity in this geographic area. Thus plants were used as indicators for biodiversity, and red-list status and endemism constituted the prime criteria for conservation value of plants. This in turn represented the key criterion for classifying biotopes. The tested biodiversity assessment tool has potential for application in different environments and operational settings but leaves room for improvement by including secondary impacts in the assessment and using a wider range of taxa for indicators of biodiversity. © 2008 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2008. Vol. 42, no 4, 698-706 p.
Keyword [en]
Biotope method, Endemism, Environmental management, Environmental product declarations, Impact assessment, Life cycle assessment, Mining, Namib Desert
National Category
Natural Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-50076DOI: 10.1007/s00267-008-9128-0OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-50076DiVA: diva2:270972
Available from: 2009-10-11 Created: 2009-10-11 Last updated: 2017-12-12

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text
In the same journal
Environmental Management
Natural Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 21 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf