liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Uncertainty and traceable calibration - how modern measurement concepts improve product quality in process industry
Department of Technology, Kalmar University, SE-391 82 Kalmar, Sweden.
Linköping University, Department of Physics, Chemistry and Biology. Linköping University, The Institute of Technology.
2006 (English)In: Measurement, ISSN 0263-2241, E-ISSN 1873-412X, Vol. 39, no 7, 612-620 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Research and advanced manufacturing demand high-quality measurement. This requires the statement of measurement uncertainty and the access to traceably calibrated instruments (with traceability to an international reference). Traceability is not obvious, however, for all kinds of industry measurements. Certain industries produce products whose quality control is based on the measurement of fuzzy, complex parameters, "attributes". Many of these parameters are nowadays measured by sophisticated instruments. They are often automated and can perform an increased number of measurements during the day. Traceability is often a problem for this type of instruments. There are solutions to solve their lack of traceability, for example round-robin rings, but they must be handled with care. Quantifying measurement uncertainty may also become problematic, since the establishment of an uncertainty budget is difficult for automated or semi-automated instruments. If traceability is lacking, an important task will be to evaluate the uncertainty of the repeatability of the instrument since this will be an important part of the uncertainty budget. This article discusses problems and solutions, using the attributes paper pulp quality and smell as illustrations. © 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2006. Vol. 39, no 7, 612-620 p.
Keyword [en]
Calibration, Fibre measurement, GUM, Smell, Traceability, Uncertainty analysis
National Category
Engineering and Technology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-50167DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2006.01.008OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-50167DiVA: diva2:271063
Available from: 2009-10-11 Created: 2009-10-11 Last updated: 2017-12-12

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text
By organisation
Department of Physics, Chemistry and BiologyThe Institute of Technology
In the same journal
Measurement
Engineering and Technology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 26 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf