liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Phase III trial of gemcitabine plus carboplatin versus single-agent gemcitabine in the treatment of locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer: The Swedish Lung Cancer Study Group
Linköping University, Faculty of Health Sciences. Linköping University, Department of Medicine and Health Sciences, Pulmonary Medicine . Östergötlands Läns Landsting, Centre of Surgery and Oncology, Department of Respiratory Medicine UHL.
Hillerdal, G..
Lamberg, K..
Kölbeck, K..
Show others and affiliations
2005 (English)In: Journal of Clinical Oncology, ISSN 0732-183X, Vol. 23, no 33, 8380-8388 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Purpose: This phase III study compared overall survival in patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) when treated with single-agent gemcitabine versus gemcitabine/carboplatin. Secondary objectives were to compare response, time to progression, toxicity, and quality of life. Patients and Methods: Chemotherapy-naive patients received either gemcitabine alone (1,250 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8, gemcitabine arm) or with carboplatin (area under the curve 5 on day 1, GC arm) every 21 days. Results: Demographics and disease characteristics of 334 randomly assigned patients were comparable on both arms. An intent-to-treat analysis showed significantly better overall survival (log-rank P = .0205) and 2-year survival (15% v 5%, P = .009) favoring the GC arm. Per Cox multivariate analysis, only two covariates, treatment arm (GC v G) and baseline performance status (0 or 1 v 2), independently influenced survival. Per-protocol analyses showed significantly longer median time to progression (5.7 v 3.9 months, P = .0001) and significantly higher objective response rate (29.6 v 11.3%, P < .0001) in the GC arm. Grade 3 to 4 leucopenia and thrombocytopenia were significantly more pronounced in the GC arm (P for both variables < .001) but importantly without associated increases in fever, infection, bleeding, or hospitalizations. There was no discernible difference in global quality-of-life patterns between treatment arms. Conclusion: In advanced NSCLC, gemcitabine/carboplatin therapy resulted in significant survival benefit compared with single-agent gemcitabine without undue increase in toxicity. © 2005 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2005. Vol. 23, no 33, 8380-8388 p.
National Category
Medical and Health Sciences
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-50351DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.01.2781OAI: diva2:271247
Available from: 2009-10-11 Created: 2009-10-11 Last updated: 2011-01-12

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Sederholm, Christer
By organisation
Faculty of Health SciencesPulmonary Medicine Department of Respiratory Medicine UHL
In the same journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Medical and Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 49 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link