liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Measuring the size of the extracellular fluid space using bromide, iohexol, and sodium dilution
Östergötlands Läns Landsting, Anaesthesiology and Surgical Centre, Department of Intensive Care UHL.
Linköping University, Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Anesthesiology. Linköping University, Faculty of Health Sciences.
Department of Anesthesiology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
2005 (English)In: Anesthesia and Analgesia, ISSN 0003-2999, E-ISSN 1526-7598, Vol. 101, no 6, p. 1770-1777Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

There is a need to find methods to assess the size of the extracellular fluid (ECF) volume without involving radioactive tracers. For this purpose, we applied 3 methods for measuring the ECF volume in 10 male volunteers (mean age, 34 yr). Steady-state plasma bromide concentration (control) was compared to the results of kinetic analysis of plasma iohexol and to kinetic analysis of the dilution of serum sodium after IV infusion of 1 L of isotonic mannitol. The volume of distribution of these tracers was used to indicate the ECF volume. The results disclosed statistically significant correlations between the results of all 3 methods, although the average sodium dilution showed 0.7 L lower values than iohexol and 1.4 L lower than bromide. All three methods correlated significantly with body weight. The percentage of the body weight indicated by the methods was 18.3% (3.1%) for sodium, 19.6% (1.0%) for iohexol, and 20.5% (1.1%) for bromide. We conclude that sodium dilution may be performed at bedside but iohexol and bromide showed less intersubject variability. Iohexol simultaneously measures the glomerular filtration rate and should be a viable clinical option if the hospital performs routine assessments of kidney function using this tracer. ©2005 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2005. Vol. 101, no 6, p. 1770-1777
National Category
Anesthesiology and Intensive Care
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-50378DOI: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000184043.91673.7EISI: 000233512400038PubMedID: 16301257Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-28344440939OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-50378DiVA, id: diva2:271274
Conference
28th Congress of the Scandinavian-Society-of-Anaesthesiology-and-Intensive-Care-Medicine, Reykjavik, Iceland, June 29-July 03, 2005
Available from: 2009-10-11 Created: 2009-10-11 Last updated: 2017-12-12Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Zdolsek, JoachimLisander, BjörnHahn, Robert G.

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Zdolsek, JoachimLisander, BjörnHahn, Robert G.
By organisation
Department of Intensive Care UHLAnesthesiologyFaculty of Health Sciences
In the same journal
Anesthesia and Analgesia
Anesthesiology and Intensive Care

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 163 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf