liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Neuronal Subtype Specification within a Lineage by Opposing Temporal Feed-Forward Loops
Linköping University, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Developmental Biology. Linköping University, Faculty of Health Sciences.
Linköping University, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Developmental Biology. Linköping University, Faculty of Health Sciences.
Division of Developmental Neuroscience, MRC National Institute for Medical Research, Mill Hill, London NW7 1AA, United Kingdom.
Centro de Biología Molecular-Severo Ochoa/C.S.I.C., Universidad Autónoma-Cantoblanco, Madrid 28049, Spain.
Show others and affiliations
2009 (English)In: Cell, ISSN 0092-8674, E-ISSN 1097-4172, Vol. 139, no 5, 969-982 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Neural progenitors generate distinct cell types at different stages, but the mechanisms controlling these temporal transitions are poorly understood. In the Drosophila CNS, a cascade of transcription factors, the ‘temporal gene cascade’, has been identified, that acts to alter progenitor competence over time. However, many CNS lineages display broad temporal windows, and it is unclear how broad windows progress into sub-windows that generate unique cell types. We have addressed this issue in an identifiable Drosophila CNS lineage, and find that a broad castor temporal window is sub-divided by two different feed-forward loops, both of which are triggered by castor itself. The first loop acts to specify a unique cell fate, while the second loop suppresses the first loop, thereby allowing for the generation of alternate cell fates. This mechanism of temporal and ‘sub-temporal’ genes acting in opposing feed-forward loops may be used by many stem cell lineages to generate diversity.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Cambridge,MA, USA: Cell Press , 2009. Vol. 139, no 5, 969-982 p.
Keyword [en]
neural progenitor, temporal transitions, feed-forward loops, combinatorial codes, cell fate specification
National Category
Developmental Biology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-51638DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.10.032ISI: 000272169400020OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-51638DiVA: diva2:276202
Note

Original Publication: Magnus Baumgardt, Daniel Karlsson, Javier Terriente, Fernando J. Díaz-Benjumea and Stefan Thor, Neuronal Subtype Specification within a Lineage by Opposing Temporal Feed-Forward Loops, 2009, Cell, (139), 5, 969-982. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2009.10.032 Copyright: Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam. http://www.cell.com/cellpress

Available from: 2009-11-11 Created: 2009-11-11 Last updated: 2017-12-12Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Genetic mechanisms behind cell specification in the Drosophila CNS
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Genetic mechanisms behind cell specification in the Drosophila CNS
2009 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

The human central nervous system (CNS) contains a daunting number of cells and tremendous cellular diversity. A fundamental challenge of developmental neurobiology is to address the questions of how so many different types of neurons and glia can be generated at the precise time and place, making precisely the right connections. Resolving this issue involves dissecting the elaborate genetic networks that act within neurons and glia, as well as in the neural progenitor cells that generates them, to specify their identities.

My PhD project has involved addressing a number of unresolved issues pertaining to how neural progenitor cells are specified to generate different types of neurons and glial cells in different temporal and spatial domains, and also how these early temporal and spatial cues are integrated to activate late cell fate determinants, which act in post-mitotic neural cells to activate distinct batteries of terminal differentiation genes.

Analyzing the development of a specific Drosophila melanogaster (Drosophila) CNS stem cell – the neuroblast 5-6 (NB5-6) – we have identified several novel mechanisms of cell fate specification in the Drosophila CNS. We find that, within this lineage, the differential specification of a group of sequentially generated neurons – the Ap cluster neurons – is critically dependent upon the simultaneous triggering of two opposing feed-forward loops (FFLs) within the neuroblast. The first FFL involves cell fate determinants and progresses within the post-mitotic neurons to establish a highly specific combinatorial code of regulators, which activates a distinct battery of terminal differentiation genes. The second loop, which progresses in the neuroblast, involves temporal and sub-temporal genes that together oppose the progression of the first FFL. This leads to the establishment of an alternative code of regulators in late-born Ap cluster neurons, whereby alternative cell fates are specified. Furthermore, we find that the generation and specification of the Ap cluster neurons is modulated along the neuraxis by two different mechanisms. In abdominal segments, Hox genes of the Bithorax cluster integrates with Pbx/Meis factors to instruct NB5-6 to leave the cell cycle before the Ap cluster neurons are generated. In brain segments, Ap cluster neuron equivalents are generated, but improperly specified due to the absence of the proper Hox and temporal code. Additionally, in thoracic segments we find that the specification of the Ap cluster neurons is critically dependent upon the integration of the Hox, Pbx/Meis, and the temporal genes, in the activation of the critical cell fate determinant FFL.

We speculate that the developmental principles of (i) feed-forward combinatorial coding; (ii) simultaneously triggered yet opposing feed-forward loops; and (iii) integration of different Hox, Pbx/Meis, and temporal factors, at different axial levels to control inter-segmental differences in lineage progression and specification; might be used widely throughout the animal kingdom to generate cell type diversity in the CNS.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Linköping: Linköping University Electronic Press, 2009. 104 p.
Series
Linköping University Medical Dissertations, ISSN 0345-0082 ; 1157
Keyword
Drosophila melanogaster, nervous system development, cell specification, stem cells, cell proliferation, combinatorial coding, feedforward loop
National Category
Developmental Biology
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-51637 (URN)978-91-7393-483-1 (ISBN)
Public defence
2009-12-04, Hörsal Linden, Campus US, Linköpings universitet, Linköping, 00:00 (English)
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2009-11-13 Created: 2009-11-11 Last updated: 2016-11-30Bibliographically approved
2. Specification of unique neuronal sub-types by integration of positional and temporal cues
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Specification of unique neuronal sub-types by integration of positional and temporal cues
2010 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

The nervous system contains vast numbers of neuronal sub-types, generated at specific time points, in the proper location, and in proper numbers. One of the fundamental issues in neurobiology is to understand the molecular genetic mechanisms that underlie the generation of this daunting neuronal diversity.

To help shed light upon these fundamental questions, my PhD project has addressed the generation and specification of a certain group of neurons, the Ap cluster. This group of four neurons is found only in thoracic segments within the Drosophila melanogaster central nervous system, and consists of three different cell types. Mapping of the neuroblast (stem cell) that generates the Ap cluster neurons, neuroblast 5-6, and the highly restricted appearance of this cluster allowed me to address the following questions: How does NB 5-6 change its temporal competence over time to generate the Ap cluster neurons late in the lineage, and how is temporal competence altered to ensure diversity among the Ap neurons? What are the mechanisms that allow these Ap cluster neurons to emerge only in the thoracic segments?

My studies have helped identify a number of mechanisms acting to specify the Ap cluster neurons. One type of mechanism involves several of different feed-forward loops that play out during NB 5-6 lineage development. These are triggered within the stem cell, where the temporal gene castor activates a number of genes. These castor targets are subsequently involved in several regulatory feed-forward loops, that ultimately result in the unique combinatorial expression of cell fate determinants in the different Ap neurons, which in turn ultimately lead to the activation of unique terminal differentiation genes. In addition, I have identified three different mechanisms by which the NB 5-6 lineage is modulated along the neuroaxis. In the abdomen I find that an early cell cycle exit is initiated by the Bx-C gene members and Pbx/Meis cofactors, which result in the truncation of the NB 5-6 lineage, preventing the Ap cluster neurons from being generated. In thoracic segments Hox, Pbx/Meisand temporal genes act in concert to specify Ap cluster neurons, by integrating with the castor temporal gene. In anterior segments, improper Hox and temporal coding results in a failure to specify bona fide Ap cluster neurons, even though equivalents of Ap cluster neurons are generated.

In summary, my thesis work has helped identify a number of mechanisms acting to specify this unique neuronal sub-type, including: feed-forward combinatorial coding, opposing feed-forward loops and integrated temporal/Hox mediated specification throughout different axial levels. I suggest that these mechanisms may be widely used within the animal kingdom, hence contributing to the great cellular diversity observed within the central nervous system of most animal species.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Linköping: Linköping University Electronic Press, 2010. 102 p.
Series
Linköping University Medical Dissertations, ISSN 0345-0082 ; 1211
National Category
Medical and Health Sciences
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-63628 (URN)978-91-7393-306-3 (ISBN)
Public defence
2010-12-03, Linden, Universitetssjukhuset, Campus US, Linköpings universitet, Linköping, 09:00 (English)
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2010-12-28 Created: 2010-12-28 Last updated: 2016-11-30Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1568 kB)533 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1568 kBChecksum SHA-512
24e973f3d19809c05683350bd4e766648cb2c590a86151bcb0fa917c7282ff408f19a11cadfb06ae92976e436e8d9ae2fe5878ad08c30672910585fc454b4245
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textLink to Ph.D. Thesis

Authority records BETA

Baumgardt, MagnusKarlsson, DanielThor, Stefan

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Baumgardt, MagnusKarlsson, DanielThor, Stefan
By organisation
Developmental BiologyFaculty of Health Sciences
In the same journal
Cell
Developmental Biology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 533 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 348 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf