liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Asylum seeking minors in interpreter-mediated interviews: what do theysay and what happens to their responses?
Linköping University, The Swedish Institute for Disability Research. Linköping University, Department of Behavioural Sciences and Learning, Disability Research. Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences.
Linköping University, The Swedish Institute for Disability Research. Linköping University, Department of Behavioural Sciences and Learning, Disability Research. Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences.
Department of Social and Developmental Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3 RQ, UK.
Linköping University, The Swedish Institute for Disability Research. Linköping University, Department of Behavioural Sciences and Learning, Disability Research. Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences.
2010 (English)In: Child & Family Social Work, ISSN 1356-7500, E-ISSN 1365-2206, Vol. 15, no 3, 325-334 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

This study explored how asylum-seeking minors report information when formally interviewed. Twenty-six Russian-speaking minors (M= 16.0 years of age) were individually interviewed by officials assisted by one of eighteen interpreters. A quantitative analysis examined the translated questions asked by the officials, the minors’ responses to them, and the accuracy with which the minors’ responses were rendered. The asylum-seeking minors distinguished themselves as active participants. They appeared eager to disclose relevant information despite being asked many potentially contaminating questions. Most of the children’s responses were accurately rendered but mistranslations can affect the fact–finding process substantially. Both the minors and the officials involved in the asylum-seeking process need to recognise that both the questions asked and the responses given may be influenced by the third parties involved, i.e. the interpreters.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Blackwell Publishing Ltd , 2010. Vol. 15, no 3, 325-334 p.
Keyword [en]
Asylum hearings, informativeness, information-seeking prompts, accuracy of translation
National Category
Social Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-52745DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2206.2010.00681.xISI: 000280709600007OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-52745DiVA: diva2:285462
Available from: 2010-01-12 Created: 2010-01-12 Last updated: 2010-08-27
In thesis
1. Restricting participation: Unaccompanied children in interpreter-mediated asylum hearings in Sweden
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Restricting participation: Unaccompanied children in interpreter-mediated asylum hearings in Sweden
2009 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Alternative title[sv]
Begränsad delaktighet : Ensamkommande barn i tolkmedierade utredningsintervjuer i Sverige
Abstract [en]

The overall goal of this thesis was to highlight different communicative aspects of participation in interpreter-mediated asylum hearings with unaccompanied Russianspeaking children who had applied for asylum in Sweden between 2001 and 2005. Participation in the asylum process is guaranteed to these children by the Swedish Administrative Law and the Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC), which are incorporated in the Swedish Aliens Act. The Migration authorities in their work with asylum seeking minors have integrated principles of the best interests of the child and the principle of respecting the children’s views on matters concerning them.

In this thesis, we have studied the conditions of participation in a highly complex, hybrid activity type, where participants face contradictory demands. Hybridity can be traced in communicative dilemmas which are difficult to solve and handle for all the participants involved, including the caseworkers, interpreters and children. The caseworkers are expected to control an interview in which whole of the communicative exchange is rendered by interpreters who influence the progress of the encounter. Contradiction lies in the fact that the caseworkers are expected to treat all asylum seekers equally both as a group and individually, by relating to general legal regulations and at the same time, take into account the interests and individual needs of an individual child. It might be difficult for these caseworkers to stay neutral and meet underage clients whose life stories and experiences, conduct and needs differ considerably from what is usually ascribed to children.

Asylum seeking children come to Sweden to stay. Our results have shown that they take an active role in their attempts to lead to a positive outcome in their cases. In this respect, children’s testimonies and the impression they make as informants play a salient role. The communicative tasks faced by the adolescents are, however, difficult to achieve. Previous life conditions, vulnerability, psychosomatic problems, and memory and concentration difficulties may affect their performance. Other factors which might further impede these children from achieving their task is the pragmatic and linguistic deficiency, which they experience in a context where they lack communicative means and are not fully aware of the norms and regulations relevant for the encounter. Despite hese limitations, it seems that these minors try hard to shoulder their role as asylum seekers and informants actively and strategically. One strategy chosen by the children was to disclose information selectively. They tried to avoid answering questions which could reveal their age, origin or the whereabouts of their caregivers and thereby enable authorities to establish their identity and send them back. To compensate for their uncooperativeness in this area, the adolescents tended to provide information which had not been asked for.

Our studies have shown that children could have been prevented by both the caseworkers and interpreters from expressing their views and opinions in a free and self-chosen way. In this respect, interpreters’ contributions were salient for what information was forwarded to the caseworkers. In some cases, they changed both the language and the format of the responses provided by the children. Some of the communicative strategies which were initiated by the interpreters could be linked to both their professional skills and to the hybridity and the complexity of the situation. Interpreters had difficulties staying neutral in relation to the children and orient them in the encounters. Age differences between the participants could also have an impact on how the children were treated and the respect and importance attributed to their voices. We have identified sequences where interpreters initiated monolingual exchanges with one of the interlocutors where they actively tried to exclude and discredit the children’s voices, something which often happened with the tacit approval of the caseworkers.

Thus, it can be seen that communicative premises which are inherent in the asylum hearings influence the participant statuses of the children and their possibilities to express their asylum claims.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Linköping: Linköping University Electronic Press, 2009. 51 + papers 1-4 p.
Series
Linköping Studies in Arts and Science, ISSN 0282-9800 ; 501Studies from the Swedish Institute for Disability Research, ISSN 1650-1128 ; 31
Keyword
Children, conditions for participation, interpreter-mediated asylum hearings, communication., Barn, delaktighet, tolkmedierade utredningssamtal, kommunikation.
National Category
Social Sciences
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-52753 (URN)978-91-7393-499-2 (ISBN)
Public defence
2009-12-21, Key 1, Hus Key, Campus Valla, Linköpings universitet, Linköping, 13:00 (English)
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2010-01-12 Created: 2010-01-12 Last updated: 2014-09-29Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records BETA

Keselman, OlgaCederborg, Ann-ChristinDahlström, Örjan

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Keselman, OlgaCederborg, Ann-ChristinDahlström, Örjan
By organisation
The Swedish Institute for Disability ResearchDisability ResearchFaculty of Arts and Sciences
In the same journal
Child & Family Social Work
Social Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 353 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf