liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Gryningsräder: Företagets rättigheter vid konkurrensrättsliga undersökningar och enligt artikel 6 och 8 i Europeiska konventionen om skydd för de mänskliga rättigheterna
Linköping University, Department of Management and Engineering.
2009 (Swedish)Independent thesis Advanced level (degree of Master (One Year)), 10 credits / 15 HE creditsStudent thesisAlternative title
Dawn Raids : The Investigated Company’s Rights in The Antitrust Procedure and Article 6 and 8 of The European Convention on Human Rights (English)
Abstract [en]

The Commission can investigate infringements of the competition rules on its own initiativeor after a complaint from a third party when it suspects the existence of a cartel under Article81 or abuse of dominant position under Article 82. The EC Commission has extensiveinvestigatory powers under Regulation 1/2003 Articles 18 and 20. The visits by theCommission are made unannounced and that’s why they are popularly known as ”dawnraids”. The surprise arrival is essential in the fact-finding process because the Commissionlooks for information, which the undertaking subject would rather not give to the Commissionand takes measures to hide.

The Commissions powers during a ”dawn raid” have been subjected to criticism. Althoughthe criticism existed while Regulation 17/1962 was applied it can be noted that theCommissions powers haven’t been changed with the regulation 1/2003. The principle ofproportionality is valid in the antitrust procedure. That means that the Commission measurescan’t exceed what is necessary to achieve the objective of the inspection.

Even though the Commission is due to respect the principle of proportionality neverthelesshas the undertaking subject often contested the Commissions exercise of its powers. In severaloccasions the company who has been submitted to a dawn raid has claimed in the EuropeanCourt of Justice (ECJ) that it’s fundamental rights, which are assured by Articles 6 and 8 ofthe European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) had been infringed during theinvestigation. The question that arises is if article 6 and 8 ECHR can be claimed in theantitrust procedure and if it’s possible to reconcile the protection of the company in theantitrust procedure with human rights. The focus of this thesis is on these questions.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2009. , 46 p.
National Category
Law
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-52799ISRN: LIU-IEI-FIL-A--09/00534--SEOAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-52799DiVA: diva2:285561
Presentation
(English)
Uppsok
Social and Behavioural Science, Law
Available from: 2010-01-12 Created: 2010-01-12 Last updated: 2010-01-12Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(214 kB)336 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 214 kBChecksum SHA-512
fc41071cfb200ecf9d95a89e78ab361ef30c185296731f589f4bddd85e349b57b6976006a171d6e8b26c52a3a7115fa4a30d2b79cf1861009200d127db7490fc
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
Department of Management and Engineering
Law

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 336 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 560 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf