liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Safe, Simple and Effective Cleaning of Shellac Coated Furniture: are Tensides a Well Motivated Alternative?
Linköping University, Department of Management and Engineering, Carl Malmsten - furniture studies. Linköping University, Department of Management and Engineering.
2009 (English)Independent thesis Basic level (professional degree), 10 credits / 15 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

The aim of this report is to investigate whether there is one method for cleaning of shellac coated surfaces which could replace the other methods usually used in restorers/conservators workshops, a method which reaches up to a set of formulated standards concerning safety, efficiency and simplicity. Frequent use of organic solvents and materials with unknown, uninvestigated content constitutes a potential risk in a long term perspective, both for the worker and the object. If it is possible to replace these methods with one that is scientifically investigated, this must be seen as a better alternative. The range of different cleaning material has been looked into and from the set of standards one non-ionic tenside has been picked out for further investigation. Theoretically, non-ionic tensides is to be considered as more suitable for cleaning of shellac surfaces since they interact with the surface in a less harmful way than ionic tensides. From cleaning analysis it has shown that the non-ionic tenside Tinovetin® JUN gives pleasing cleaning results equivalent to the ordinary washing up liquid, “Fairy” (in Sweden known as “Yes”). However, from wetting ability analysis it shows that “Fairy” is more powerful. A contact angle analysis showed that Tinovetin® JUN leaves more residue than “Fairy” but the difference is not remarkable. Since washing up liquid contain ionic tensides, it is motivated to advocate Tinovetin® JUN preferably to “Fairy”.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2009. , 34 p.
National Category
Humanities
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-53271ISRN: LIU-IEI-TEK-G--09/00116—SEOAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-53271DiVA: diva2:287965
Presentation
2009-06-03, Carl Malmsten, 00:00 (Swedish)
Uppsok
Fine Art
Supervisors
Available from: 2010-01-25 Created: 2010-01-20 Last updated: 2010-01-25Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(6946 kB)2764 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 6946 kBChecksum SHA-512
0ebd6a7ad03e7d481429f4ba1306f3e99d2667f52ef8075957aef79313adb13e06776a4aa9f91ea8e183c03d5f98c27589af14c721bb9410e0998196ddc58561
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
Carl Malmsten - furniture studiesDepartment of Management and Engineering
Humanities

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 2764 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 1657 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf