liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Laparoscopic resection of colon cancer - Consensus of the European Association of Endoscopic Surgery (EAES)
Department of General Surgery, Erasmus MC.
Department of General Surgery, Erasmus MC.
Department of General Surgery, Erasmus MC.
Department of General Surgery, Erasmus MC.
Show others and affiliations
2004 (English)In: Surgical Endoscopy, ISSN 0930-2794, E-ISSN 1432-2218, Vol. 18, no 8, 1163-1185 p.Article, review/survey (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background: The European Association of Endoscopic Surgery (EAES) initiated a consensus development conference on the laparoscopic resection of colon cancer during the annual congress in Lisbon, Portugal, in June 2002. Methods: A systematic review of the current literature was combined with the opinions, of experts in the field of colon cancer surgery to formulate evidence-based statements and recommendations on the laparoscopic resection of colon cancer. Results: Advanced age, obesity, and previous abdominal operations are not considered absolute contraindications for laparoscopic colon cancer surgery. The most common cause for conversion is the presence of bulky or invasive tumors. Laparoscopic operation takes longer to perform than the open counterpart, but the outcome is similar in terms of specimen size and pathological examination. Immediate postoperative morbidity and mortality are comparable for laparoscopic and open colonic cancer surgery. The laparoscopically operated patients had less postoperative pain, better-preserved pulmonary function, earlier restoration of gastrointestinal function, and an earlier discharge from the hospital. The postoperative stress response is lower after laparoscopic colectomy. The incidence of port site metastases is less than1%. Survival after laparoscopic resection of colon cancer appears to be at least equal to survival after open resection. The costs of laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer are higher than those for open surgery. Conclusion: Laparoscopic resection of colon cancer is a safe and feasible procedure that improves short-term outcome. Results regarding the long-term survival of patients enrolled in large multicenter trials will determine its role in general surgery.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2004. Vol. 18, no 8, 1163-1185 p.
Keyword [en]
laparoscopic resection; colon cancer; contraindications; conversion; morbidity and mortality; outcomes; stress response; port site metastasis; costs
National Category
Engineering and Technology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-53520DOI: 10.1007/s00464-003-8253-3OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-53520DiVA: diva2:289672
Available from: 2010-01-25 Created: 2010-01-25 Last updated: 2017-12-12

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text
By organisation
Department of Biomedicine and SurgeryFaculty of Health Sciences
In the same journal
Surgical Endoscopy
Engineering and Technology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 24 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf