liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
High-dose atorvastatin vs usual dose simvastatin for secondary prevention after myocardial infarction - The IDEAL study: A randomized controlled trial
Ullevål University Hospital.
Århus University Hospital.
Academic Hospital Amsterdam.
Linköping University, Department of Medicine and Health Sciences, Internal Medicine . Linköping University, Faculty of Health Sciences. Östergötlands Läns Landsting, Centre for Medicine, Department of Endocrinology and Gastroenterology UHL.
Show others and affiliations
2005 (English)In: Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), ISSN 0098-7484, E-ISSN 1538-3598, Vol. 294, no 19, 2437-2445 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Context Evidence suggests that more intensive lowering of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) than is commonly applied clinically will provide further benefit in stable coronary artery disease. Objective To compare the effects of 2 strategies of lipid lowering on the risk of cardiovascular disease among patients with a previous myocardial infarction (MI). Design, Setting, and Participants The IDEAL study, a prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded end-point evaluation trial conducted at 190 ambulatory cardiology care and specialist practices in northern Europe between March 1999 and March 2005 with a median follow-up of 4.8 years, which enrolled 8888 patients aged 80 years or younger with a history of acute MI. Interventions Patients were randomly assigned to receive a high dose of atorvastatin (80 mg/d; n=4439), or usual-dose simvastatin (20 mg/d; n=4449). Main Outcome Measure Occurrence of a major coronary event, defined as coronary death, confirmed nonfatal acute MI, or cardiac arrest with resuscitation. Results During treatment, mean LDL-C levels were 104 (SE, 0.3) mg/dL in the simvastatin group and 81 (SE, 0.3) mg/dL in the atorvastatin group. A major coronary event occurred in 463 simvastatin patients (10.4%) and in 411 atorvastatin patients (9.3%) (hazard ratio [HR], 0.89; 95% Cl, 0.78-1.01; P=.07). Nonfatal acute MI occurred in 321 (7.2%) and M7 (6.0%) in the 2 groups (HR, 0.83; 95% Cl, 0.71-0.98; P=.02), but no differences were seen in the 2 other components of the primary end point. Major cardiovascular events occurred in 608 and 533 in the 2 groups, respectively (HR, 0.87; 95% Cl, 0.77-0.98; P=.02). Occurrence of any coronary event was reported in 1059 simvastatin and 898 atorvastatin patients (HR, 0.84; 95% Cl, 0.76-0.91; Pless than.001). Non-cardiovascular death occurred in 156 (3.5%) and 143 (3.2%) in the 2 groups (HR, 0.92; 95% Cl, 0.73-1.15; P=.47). Death from any cause occurred in 374 (8.4%) in the simvastatin group and 366 (8.2%) in the atorvastatin group (HR, 0.98; 95% Cl, 0.85-1.13; P=.81). Patients in the atorvastatin group had higher rates of drug discontinuation due to nonserious adverse events; transaminase elevation resulted in 43 (1.0%) vs 5 (0.1%) withdrawals (Pless than.001). Serious myopathy and rhabdomyolysis were rare in both groups. Conclusions In this study of patients with previous MI, intensive lowering of LDL-C did not result in a significant reduction in the primary outcome of major coronary events, but did reduce the risk of other composite secondary end points and nonfatal acute MI. There were no differences in cardiovascular or all-cause mortality. Patients with MI may benefit from intensive lowering of LDL-C without an increase in noncardiovascular mortality or other serious adverse reactions.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2005. Vol. 294, no 19, 2437-2445 p.
National Category
Medical and Health Sciences
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-53501DOI: 10.1001/jama.294.19.2437OAI: diva2:289806
Available from: 2010-01-25 Created: 2010-01-25 Last updated: 2010-04-21

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textLink to Journal

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Olsson, Anders
By organisation
Internal Medicine Faculty of Health SciencesDepartment of Endocrinology and Gastroenterology UHL
In the same journal
Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA)
Medical and Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 72 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link