liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Motivated patients are more cost-effectively rehabilitated - A two-year prospective controlled study of patients with prolonged musculoskeletal disorders diagnosed in primary care
Lund University.
Linköping University, Department of Medicine and Health Sciences, General Practice. Linköping University, Faculty of Health Sciences. Östergötlands Läns Landsting, Local Health Care Services in the West of Östergötland, Unit of Research and Development in Local Health Care, County of Östergötland.
Lund University.
2000 (English)In: International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, ISSN 0266-4623, Vol. 16, no 3, 849-863 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Objectives: To compare the cost-effectiveness of a multidisciplinary rehabilitation program with traditional treatment within primary care in terms of the health-related duality of life (HRQOL) in patients with prolonged musculoskeletal disorders (MSD) on the one hand and the costs to society on the other. Predictors of total costs, such as motivation, socio-economic level, age, pain, and working environment, were investigated. Methods: A prospective, matched, controlled 2-year follow-up study was designed. The main outcome measures were HRQOL using the Nottingham Health profile (NHP) and patient-specific total costs due to society. The cost-effectiveness was expressed as a quotient of the total costs to society/NHP global score difference value. Results: Patients with prolonged MSD generate substantial total costs to society, chiefly in the area of indirect costs. Multidisciplinary rehabilitation improved HRQOL more cost-effectively. Motivation was revealed as a predictor of total costs. The relationship in savings in terms of indirect costs between the highly-motivated and the less-motivated patients was calculated at 4:1. Conclusions: The large group of patients with prolonged MSD generate substantial total costs, and even small reductions in direct and indirect costs could be of importance to society. The multidisciplinary rehabilitation program applied here was more cost-effective as compared with conventional treatment within primary care when it came to improving the patients perceived HRQOL. Motivation could be a predictor of total costs, which has to be addressed in the process of identifying the patient as a partner in the rehabilitation process.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2000. Vol. 16, no 3, 849-863 p.
Keyword [en]
musculoskeletal diseases; motivation; quality of life; primary health care; cost-effectiveness analysis
National Category
Medical and Health Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-53591DOI: 10.1017/S0266462300102120OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-53591DiVA: diva2:290094
Available from: 2010-01-26 Created: 2010-01-26 Last updated: 2010-03-04

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records BETA

Borgquist, Lars

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Borgquist, Lars
By organisation
General PracticeFaculty of Health SciencesUnit of Research and Development in Local Health Care, County of Östergötland
In the same journal
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
Medical and Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 1537 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf