liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Hair analysis for drugs in drivers license regranting. A Swedish pilot study
Linköping University, Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Division of Drug Research. Linköping University, Faculty of Health Sciences.
National Board for Forens Medicine.
National Board for Forens Medicine.
National Board for Forens Medicine.
2010 (English)In: FORENSIC SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL, ISSN 0379-0738, Vol. 196, no 1-3, 55-58 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

When being convicted for petty drug offence or driving under the influence of drugs in Sweden, the driving license may be suspended. To regain the license, the person has to prove that he or she has been drug free during an observation period. This is controlled by urine samples taken at several occasions. However, the risk of manipulation and the risk of false negative urine samples are high. In addition, many people find it difficult or embarrassing to urinate when observed. Hair sampling might therefore be a welcome option to this procedure, with its easy sampling and minimal risk of manipulation. The longer detection window may also provide better information to the physician. The aim of this work was to evaluate if clients preferred hair samples to urine and to investigate practical and interpretive problems or advantages with hair samples. Ninety-nine hair samples and 198 urine samples were collected from 84 clients during the 12 month study period. Hair samples were divided into either one segment (0-3 cm) or two segments (0-3 and 3-6 cm) depending on the length. The hair samples were screened with LC-MS-MS for 20 drugs and confirmation of positive results were performed with GC-MS or LC-MS-MS. The results were compared to urine samples taken at two occasions during the observation period. To cover the timeframe of the urine samples hair was collected 2 weeks after the second sample. The urine samples were analysed with immunochemical screening and positive results confirmed with GC-MS or LC-MS-MS. Seventy-four clients presented with negative results in both urine and hair. Hair analysis identified illegal drugs at seven different occasions whereas urine failed to identify any illegal drugs. However the thresholds used may still be too high to find sporadic use as clients that admitted to use drugs sporadically presented with drug concentrations lower than the agreed thresholds but above the limit of detection. This implicates that the physician must have an understanding and knowledge of the limitations of the screening methods used. Another important outcome was that the clients approved of hair sampling considering it a better means to prove their drug abstinence. In addition, both the clients and the clinicians thought hair sampling easier than urine sampling. We believe that hair analysis can offer several advantages compared to urine analysis for clinicians working with driving license regranting.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2010. Vol. 196, no 1-3, 55-58 p.
Keyword [en]
Hair analysis, Drivers licence regranting, LC-MS-MS
National Category
Engineering and Technology
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-54400DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2009.12.036ISI: 000274866500012OAI: diva2:303527
Available from: 2010-03-12 Created: 2010-03-12 Last updated: 2014-01-09Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Kronstrand, Robert
By organisation
Division of Drug ResearchFaculty of Health Sciences
Engineering and Technology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 63 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link