liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
How big is the gap between olfactory detection and recognition of aliphatic aldehydes?
Linköping University, Department of Physics, Chemistry and Biology, Zoology . Linköping University, The Institute of Technology.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5583-2697
Linköping University, Department of Physics, Chemistry and Biology. Linköping University, The Institute of Technology.
2010 (English)In: Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, ISSN 1943-393X, Vol. 72, no 3, 806-812 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The aim of the present study was to determine the magnitude of the difference in concentration between olfactory detection and recognition thresholds of aliphatic aldehydes. To this end, we first determined olfactory detection thresholds for n-butanal, n-pentanal, n-hexanal, n-heptanal, and n-octanal in a group of 16 subjects and then assessed their ability to discriminate between all possible binary pairs of the same odorants presented at different concentrations above their individual detection thresholds. We found that the gap between detection and recognition of aliphatic aldehydes is odorant pair dependent and, at the group level, spans at least a factor of 100. However, single subjects successfully discriminated between certain aldehyde pairs presented at a factor as low as 3 above detection threshold. Our approach to determining olfactory recognition thresholds, using a performance-based measure rather than verbal labeling, not only avoids the problem of semantic ambiguity and arguable criteria, but also is applicable to nonhuman species, allowing for interspecific comparisons of recognition thresholds and of the gap between detection and recognition of odorants. The raw discrimination data from this study are available as a supplement from http://app.psychonomic-journals.org/content/supplemental.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
-: The Psychonomic Society, Inc. , 2010. Vol. 72, no 3, 806-812 p.
National Category
Natural Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-54670DOI: 10.3758/APP.72.3.806ISI: 000282067000025OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-54670DiVA: diva2:306800
Available from: 2010-04-08 Created: 2010-03-31 Last updated: 2015-03-06Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textSupplemental raw data

Authority records BETA

Laska, Matthias

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Laska, Matthias
By organisation
Zoology The Institute of TechnologyDepartment of Physics, Chemistry and Biology
Natural Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 84 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf