liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Swedish Rehabilitation Professionals’ Perspectives on Work Ability Assessments in a Changing Sickness Insurance System
Linköping University, Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Work and Rehabilitation. Linköping University, Faculty of Health Sciences. Linköping University, HELIX Vinn Excellence Centre.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3310-0895
Linköping University, Department of Behavioural Sciences and Learning, Sociology. Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences.
Linköping University, Department of Behavioural Sciences and Learning, Sociology. Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences.
Linköping University, Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Work and Rehabilitation. Linköping University, HELIX Vinn Excellence Centre. Linköping University, Faculty of Health Sciences. (HELIX Vinn Excellence Centre)ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8031-7651
2011 (English)In: Disability and Rehabilitation, ISSN 0963-8288, E-ISSN 1464-5165, Vol. 33, no 15-16, 1373-1382 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Purpose: This article analyses Swedish rehabilitation professionals’ perspectives on how changed sickness insurance regulations will affect their practice and cooperation, with a special focus on work ability assessments.

Method: Two groups of representatives (n=15) from different organizations involved in rehabilitation and return-towork met 7 times to discuss their practice from a cooperation perspective. The groups worked with a tutor according to a problem-based methodology to discuss how their practice is influenced by new structures for cooperation. The material was analysed inductively using qualitative content analysis.

Results: The results show that work ability assessments are often made without considering work characteristics. Officials at the Social Insurance Agency do not consider themselves competent in assessing work ability. The basis for decisions of eligibility for sickness benefits is thus weak, which is troublesome from a legal perspective. The officials do not cooperate with employers or occupational health services in work ability assessments.

Conclusions: Recent policy changes calls for comprehensive cooperation between the insurance system, health care, employment services and employers. This study shows that there are flaws in this cooperation. The design of the system is in conflict with the policy ambition of increasing return-to-work, because it disregards employers as cooperation partners.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Informa Healthcare , 2011. Vol. 33, no 15-16, 1373-1382 p.
National Category
Medical and Health Sciences Social Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-54893DOI: 10.3109/09638288.2010.532282ISI: 000291886000010OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-54893DiVA: diva2:311071
Note
Original Publication: Christian Ståhl, Tommy Svensson, Gunilla Petersson and Kerstin Ekberg, Swedish Rehabilitation Professionals’ Perspectives on Work Ability Assessments in a Changing Sickness Insurance System, 2011, Disability and Rehabilitation, (33), 15-16, 1373-1382. http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2010.532282 Copyright: Informa Healthcare http://informahealthcare.com/ Available from: 2010-04-20 Created: 2010-04-20 Last updated: 2017-12-12
In thesis
1. In Cooperation We Trust: Interorganizational Cooperation in Return-to-Work and Labour Market Reintegration
Open this publication in new window or tab >>In Cooperation We Trust: Interorganizational Cooperation in Return-to-Work and Labour Market Reintegration
2010 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

The overarching aim of this thesis is to study Coordination Associations (CAs) as a structure for interor-ganizational cooperation in rehabilitation, return-to-work and labour market reintegration. This has been done through empirical studies of two CAs in eastern Sweden.

Central questions for the thesis are:

  • How have representatives on different hierarchical levels in the participating organizations experi-enced cooperation within the structure of CAs?
  • What influence do different organizational and/or professional preferences have on interorganiza-tional cooperation?

The four studies in this thesis have had different approaches to studying interorganizational cooperation.

Study I was concerned with a specific work form, namely interdisciplinary rehabilitation teams, where the analysis concerned how the different professionals in these teams perceived the common work, and how they interpreted the concept of work ability, which is a central concept for determining eligibility for sickness benefits.

Study II focused on managers and board members of the CAs in order to determine their motives for and commitment to interorganizational cooperation. The analysis was concerned with the organizational identification and the self-interest of each actor, where the issue of trust between representatives from dif-ferent organizations was specifically targeted in the analysis.

Study II focused on managers and board members of the CAs in order to determine their motives for and commitment to interorganizational cooperation. The analysis was concerned with the organizational identification and the self-interest of each actor, where the issue of trust between representatives from dif-ferent organizations was specifically targeted in the analysis.

Study III aimed to elucidate the perspectives of officials in different organizations connected to the CAs regarding both the development of cooperation in the CAs, and how the recent changes in sickness insurance regulations will influence future cooperation.

Study IV focused on different perspectives regarding the concept of work ability among representa-tives from all participating organizations, since changes in sickness insurance regulations have changed the assessment process and therefore also the demands for interorganizational cooperation.

The general methodological approach to the studies in this thesis has been explorative; qualitative methods have been used, involving interviews, focus groups and problem-based group discussions. Inter-views and focus groups have had an open-ended structure, and the material has been analysed through qualitative content analysis.

The aim of the Coordination Associations studied in this thesis has been to bridge the gaps between the participating organizations by promoting consensus through common work forms. However, the re-sults from the studies show that such ambitions are troublesome in highly specialized public organizations. Cooperation in the CAs has to a large extent been organized as collaborative work forms rather than as coordination of existing practices. The collaboration has been based on an idea of consensus, where all organizations were expected to participate on equal terms and find common work forms. Although it has been shown that officials from different organizations can work together, the managerial level’s priorities are more determined by their organizational goals and values, which makes them unwilling to finance collaborative work on a longer term.

Another theme of the thesis is the lack of cooperation between the public rehabilitation system and the employers. The public actors lack knowledge of working conditions, and since the work principle guides the rehabilitation process, it is necessary to incorporate employers into the cooperation to facilitate sustainable return-to-work and labour market reintegration.

A central conclusion of the thesis is that consensus is not a reasonable starting point when designing cooperation structures between public organizations. A sustainable cooperation structure needs to incorpo-rate and coordinate the different actors’ priorities into a long-term cooperation strategy, rather than base the cooperation on vulnerable collaboration projects.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Linköping: Linköping University Electronic Press, 2010. 117 p.
Series
Linköping University Medical Dissertations, ISSN 0345-0082 ; 1171
National Category
Medical and Health Sciences
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-54894 (URN)978-91-7393-430-5 (ISBN)
Public defence
2010-05-25, Aulan, Hälsans hus, Campus US, Linköpings universitet, Linköping, 13:00 (English)
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2010-04-20 Created: 2010-04-20 Last updated: 2013-09-03Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(601 kB)711 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 601 kBChecksum SHA-512
c7ab6eac477e0077288fea7360890ab97f27eae622f1a95c47f4b8637678b75cc533ad9401937378922c42047343cdf496e7947a91f7f78999e714ade254030f
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records BETA

Ståhl, ChristianSvensson, TommyPetersson, GunillaEkberg, Kerstin

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Ståhl, ChristianSvensson, TommyPetersson, GunillaEkberg, Kerstin
By organisation
Work and RehabilitationFaculty of Health SciencesHELIX Vinn Excellence CentreSociologyFaculty of Arts and Sciences
In the same journal
Disability and Rehabilitation
Medical and Health SciencesSocial Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 711 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 339 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf