liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Contextualism, assessment-relativity and content-insensitivity
Linköping University, Department of Culture and Communication, Arts and Humanities. Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences.
2009 (English)Conference paper (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Recently, a number of authors have argued that contextualist analyses of for example epistemic modals and matters of taste are inadequate and need to be recast in terms of assessment-relative truth or assessment-relative contents. The viability of such relativist proposals have been much discussed recently, but what has not been noted is that a minor adjustment of a standard non-relativist background assumption yields the same predictions of linguistic intuitions and behaviour as does the intrusive revisions called for by relativism. The evidence adduced to support assessment-relative accounts consists mostly in cases where the following seems to be true: EVIDENCE: The correctness of an utterance (or belief) is appropriately assessed without sensitivity to the truth-conditions assigned to that utterance by contextualist accounts. Such cases might seem to suggest that the content of the utterance, or the proposition it expresses, has assessment-relative truth-conditions, or that the utterance has its contents relative to contexts of assessment. From the non-relativist perspective, however, such cases can simply be understood as cases of appropriate content-insensitive assessments; the assessor is simply assessing a content other than (but related to) that expressed by the original speaker or accepted as true by the original believer. Instead of relativizing contents or truth-conditions to contexts of assessment, this perspective gives a contextualist account of the content of acts of assessment, where the content of utterances like "no", "yes" or of the form "[what he said/that] is [true/right/wrong]" depend on their context in ways corresponding exactly to the assessor-relativity proposed by critics of contextualist analyses. In my talk, which is based on joint work with Alexander Almér, I compare this contextualist interpretation with relativist alternatives and argue that it provides a theoretically preferable accommodation of various examples of EVIDENCE.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Keyword [en]
Relativism, contextualism, insensitive assessments, MacFarlane, Egan
National Category
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-54961OAI: diva2:312497
Pragmatics, Semantics, and Systematicity; Stockholm 8-9 maj 2009
Available from: 2010-04-25 Created: 2010-04-25 Last updated: 2010-04-26

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Björnsson, Gunnar
By organisation
Arts and HumanitiesFaculty of Arts and Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Total: 42 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link