liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Sampling for Chlamydia trachomatis infection – a comparison of vaginal, first-catch urine, combined vaginal and first-catch urine and endocervical sampling
Östergötlands Läns Landsting, Centre for Medicine, Department of Dermatology and Venerology in Östergötland. Östergötlands Läns Landsting, Local Health Care Services in the West of Östergötland, Unit of Research and Development in Local Health Care, County of Östergötland. Linköping University, Faculty of Health Sciences.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8336-9767
Östergötlands Läns Landsting, Centre for Medicine, Department of Dermatology and Venerology in Östergötland.
Ryhov County Hospital, Jönköping.
Örebro Universitet.
2010 (English)In: International Journal of STD and AIDS (London), ISSN 0956-4624, E-ISSN 1758-1052, ISSN 0956-4624, Vol. 21, no 4, 283-287 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The aim of the study was to evaluate the sensitivity of patients' self-sampled vaginal specimens, first-catch urine (FCU), combined vaginal/FCU specimens and endocervical specimens for detecting chlamydial infection in women. Women attending sexually transmitted disease clinics, youth clinics and a women's health clinic were enrolled. They self-collected a vaginal specimen with two swabs, which were placed into a sterile tube and into a tube containing a buffer medium, respectively. An FCU sample was collected and aliquoted into both an empty tube and the tube containing the vaginal swab. A clinician collected an endocervical swab. The samples were sent to laboratories for analysis using polymerase chain reaction testing and strand displacement amplification testing, respectively. The sensitivities calculated in all 171 Chlamydia trachomatis-infected women were equal for endocervical specimens (97.1%), vaginal specimens (96.5%) and combined vaginal/FCU specimens (95.3%), whereas the sensitivity for FCU was significantly lower (87.7%). The sensitivity of vaginal specimens for the detection of C. trachomatis is as high as that of combined vaginal/FCU specimens.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2010. Vol. 21, no 4, 283-287 p.
Keyword [en]
Chlamydia trachomatis, self-collected-vaginal-swabs
Keyword [sv]
Klamydia, självprovtagning kvinnor
National Category
Dermatology and Venereal Diseases
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-56427DOI: 10.1258/ijsa.2009.009440ISI: 000277903600012OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-56427DiVA: diva2:318917
Available from: 2010-05-11 Created: 2010-05-11 Last updated: 2017-12-12

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records BETA

Falk, Lars

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Falk, Lars
By organisation
Department of Dermatology and Venerology in ÖstergötlandUnit of Research and Development in Local Health Care, County of ÖstergötlandFaculty of Health Sciences
In the same journal
International Journal of STD and AIDS (London)
Dermatology and Venereal Diseases

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 75 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf