liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Adapting the Individualized Care Scale for cross-cultural comparison
University of Turku.
University of Kristianstad.
Linköping University, Department of Medicine and Health Sciences, Nursing Science. Linköping University, Faculty of Health Sciences.
University of Athens.
Show others and affiliations
2010 (English)In: SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF CARING SCIENCES, ISSN 0283-9318, Vol. 24, no 2, 392-403 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Rationale: Cross-cultural comparative studies using reliable and valid instruments can increase awareness of the differences and similarities between health workers ability to respond to patients individual needs within different health systems. This will enable a better understanding of cultural perspectives in individualized nursing care. Aim: To describe the translation and adaptation process of the Individualized Care Scale (ICS) and examine its reliability and validity in a cross-cultural study. Design: A cross-sectional comparative study. Settings: Twenty-seven orthopaedic and trauma in-patient units at 14 hospitals in 5 countries. Participants: A total of 1126 patients were included in the study: Finland (n = 425), Greece (n = 315), Sweden (n = 218), UK (n = 135) and USA (n = 33). Methods: A systematic forward-and back-translation procedure using bilingual techniques, a committee approach, pretest techniques and pilot testing were used with a convenience sample to produce a valid ICS for each participating group. Psychometric evaluation of the adapted ICS was based on means, SD, missing data analysis, Cronbachs alpha coefficients and average inter-item correlations. Construct validity was examined using sub-scale correlations to total scales and principal components analysis. Results: The use of the range of options and the sub-scale mean scores ranging from 2.72 to 4.30 demonstrated the sensitivity of the scale. Cronbachs alpha coefficients (0.77-0.97) and average inter-item correlations (0.37-0.77) were acceptable. The sub-scale correlations to total scales were high (0.83-0.97). The underlying theoretical construct of the ICS was demonstrated by the explained variances ranging from 58% to 79%. Conclusions: The ICS shows promise as a tool for evaluating individualized care in European cultures. The international expansion of an existing instrument developed for one country facilitates comparative studies across countries. There is a need to further test the construct validity and appropriateness of the ICS in different settings in European and nonwestern cultures.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Blackwell Publishing Ltd , 2010. Vol. 24, no 2, 392-403 p.
Keyword [en]
individualized nursing care, inpatients, cross-cultural comparison, instrument adaptation
National Category
Medical and Health Sciences
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-56679DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2009.00712.xISI: 000277713500024OAI: diva2:321241
Available from: 2010-05-31 Created: 2010-05-31 Last updated: 2010-05-31

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Idvall, Ewa
By organisation
Nursing ScienceFaculty of Health Sciences
Medical and Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 29 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link