liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Psychometric properties of the Worker Role Self-assessment instrument used to evaluate unemployed people in Sweden
Lund University.
Linköping University, Department of Social and Welfare Studies, Health, Activity, Care. Linköping University, Faculty of Health Sciences.
Malmö University.
2009 (English)In: SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY, ISSN 1103-8128, Vol. 16, no 4, 238-246 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The aim was to determine the psychometric properties of the new Worker Role Self-assessment (WRS) instrument. The content validity, utility, test-retest reliability, sensitivity to change, and predictive validity of the WRS were investigated in two subject samples, which were selected at work and pain rehabilitation clinics, respectively. One of these groups consisted of 23 clients and four occupational therapists, and the other comprised 83 clients. All clients in both samples were unemployed. The results showed that both the clients and the occupational therapists perceived the content validity and the utility of the WRS as good. The test-retest reliability showed mostly good to moderate agreement, and the internal consistency was satisfactory. One of the items showed predictive validity for work capacity, and the same item was sensitive to change. However, a ceiling effect reduced the utility and the sensitivity to change. Our findings indicate that the WRS is promising as a tool that clinicians can use to evaluate the capacity for return to work and for planning interventions, although some revisions are needed to counteract the ceiling effect.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Taylor and Francis (Informa Healthcare) , 2009. Vol. 16, no 4, 238-246 p.
Keyword [en]
Assessment, chronic pain, reliability, return to work, stress-related disorders, utility, validity
National Category
Medical and Health Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-57160DOI: 10.3109/11038120902730166ISI: 000278021800005OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-57160DiVA: diva2:323565
Available from: 2010-06-11 Created: 2010-06-11 Last updated: 2010-06-11

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records BETA

Haglund, Lena

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Haglund, Lena
By organisation
Health, Activity, CareFaculty of Health Sciences
Medical and Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 42 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf