liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Centre of Rotation Determination Using Projection Data in X-ray Micro Computed Tomography
Linköping University, Department of Medicine and Care, Radio Physics. Linköping University, Faculty of Health Sciences.
1994 (English)Report (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

There are several methods available to determine the Centre Of Rotation, COR, and align detectors and X-ray focus to COR in X-ray computed tomography. Some methods use narrow rods/needles or specially made alignment objects or phantoms. In X-ray Micro Computed Tomography (or Computerized Micro Tomography), μCT (CMT), methods using sample projection data for COR measurements are preferred since the replacement of alignment objects with samples often displace translation stages and make the alignment obsolete. To achieve an optimal image quality, precise positioning of COR to the detector and X-ray focus is essential. In μCT this can be accomplished in an alignment procedure using sample projection data prior to scanning. This alignment procedure will add examination time and increase the dose to the sample. Therefore the alignment procedure should incorporate as few projections as possible and be insensitive to noise. Some scanning equipment cannot be modified to implement such alignment procedure but actual COR can be determined from projection data and used in reconstruction. This report introduces a new Translated Opposite Projection, TOP, technique using a pair of opposite parallel projections (180° apart). Two TOP methods are developed: TOPlin using linear interpolation in the spatial domain and TOPfft in the frequency domain. The two TOP methods are compared to two Centre Of Gravity, COG, methods. The two COG methods are: COGsin, an enhancement of a method presented by Hogan et al [Hogan93] and COGopp, a simplification of this method possible with a fixed COR.

In this report all projections in one scan are assumed to have a fixed, COR, as in third (or higher) generation tomography or first (and second generation) tomography if the translation stage errors is negligible. This also means that the rotation stage errors must be negligible. The COGsin is the only method presented here capable of determine a COR for each projection angle, thus allowing for a COR moving as a function of projection angle. The TOP methods normally give better precision with non-ideal projection data compared to the COG methods. Tests using both simulated and scanned projection data indicate that the TOP methods give higher precision in presence of stochastic errors (noise) and system errors like calibration errors. A μCT scan often takes a long time and detector calibration and X-ray intensity profiles might vary with time giving non-stationary system errors during a single scan. If the system errors can be approximated with simple polynomial functions, a new Baseline Restoration, BR, technique can be used together with the TOP methods to reduce COR errors.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Linköping: Linköping University Electronic Press , 1994. , 21 p.
Series
Report / Department of Radiology, Linköping University, 1990-1997, ISSN 1102-1799 ; 77
National Category
Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Medical Imaging
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-57760ISRN: LIU-RAD-R-077OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-57760DiVA: diva2:327718
Available from: 2010-06-30 Created: 2010-06-30 Last updated: 2010-06-30Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

Centre of Rotation Determination Using Projection Data in X-ray Micro Computed Tomography(500 kB)836 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 500 kBChecksum SHA-512
5918d7acc0784c811be507742f2e3d442576d024e48cb05a22ff05c7348c82a1f67aaefd625e1b7bac7f8a2edc046ec374900c28db3f758ffe0e71ee256e16a0
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Authority records BETA

Olander, Birger

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Olander, Birger
By organisation
Radio PhysicsFaculty of Health Sciences
Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Medical Imaging

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 836 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 1341 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf