liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Radiography and Flouroscopy: Physical principles and biohazards
Linköping University, Department of Medicine and Care, Radio Physics. Linköping University, Faculty of Health Sciences. Östergötlands Läns Landsting, Centre of Surgery and Oncology, Department of Radiation Physics.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3352-8330
1995 (English)Report (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Diagnostic radiology has come a long way since the discovery of ‘A New Kind of Rays’ in Würzburg by Professor Wilhelm Conrad Röntgen in November 1895. Professor Röntgen called the unknown rays ‘X rays’, but they are also, most appropriately and less mysteriously, referred to as Röntgen rays after their discoverer. In the last decades, imaging techniques using X rays has developed rapidly and play an important role in modern health care.

The benefit of an X-ray examination for a patient could be assessed as how the patient’s risk situation is affected. The medical condition or illness leading to the examination may imply an increased risk of deteriorating health. Correct diagnosis and proper treatment, based on the information in the X-ray image, could lower the patient’s risk. For the individual the risks associated with the X-ray examination itself are small as is the radiation risk (patient absorbed dose) for well-designed imaging systems. Since the number of individuals undergoing X-ray examinations is very large, the collective absorbed dose to the whole population will be significant. Medical X-ray examinations are the manmade source giving the single largest radiation burden to the population, e.g., consisting 87% of the total radiation burden in the United Kingdom. Failure to diagnose is probably the largest single risk for the patient, but for some patients adverse effects of injected contrast media may be potentially hazardous.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Linköping: Linköping University Electronic Press , 1995. , 24 p.
Series
Report / Department of Radiology, Linköping University, 1990-1997, ISSN 1102-1799 ; 80
National Category
Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Medical Imaging
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-57762ISRN: LIU-RAD-R-080OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-57762DiVA: diva2:327721
Available from: 2010-06-30 Created: 2010-06-30 Last updated: 2013-09-03Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

Radiography and Flouroscopy : Physical principles and biohazards(551 kB)3017 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 551 kBChecksum SHA-512
1aecf1abe9be2180a0a9d5718028615ea2d82287e55f394bbf14bbe8b93dbbc6ad4d3299f32b01343c98ed78be5686d646f02cdd3ad83a29d18f0711ddad2fac
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Authority records BETA

Sandborg, Mickael

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Sandborg, Mickael
By organisation
Radio PhysicsFaculty of Health SciencesDepartment of Radiation Physics
Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Medical Imaging

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 3017 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 113 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf