liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Inter-organizational Information Systems and Interaction in Public vs. Private Sector: Comparing Two Cases
Linköping University, Department of Management and Engineering, VITS - Development of Informations Systems and Work Context. Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2784-863X
Linköping University, Department of Management and Engineering, VITS - Development of Informations Systems and Work Context. Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences. (Informatik)ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4701-6272
2010 (English)In: Electronic Government: 9th IFIP WG 8.5 International Conference, EGOV 2010, Lausanne, Switzerland, August 29 - September 2, 2010. Proceedings / [ed] Wimmer, M.A., Chappelet, J-L., Janssen, M., Scholl, H., Berlin: Springer , 2010, p. 38-49Conference paper, Published paper (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

This paper compares inter-organizational (IO) interaction and inter-organizational information systems (IOS) in public and private sector. The purpose of the paper is to explore differences and similarities between e-government and e-business focusing IOS and interaction. This is done in order to facilitate learning between the two fields. The point of departure is two case studies performed in private vs. public sectors. A comparative study is made using IO concepts from industrial markets that characterize an IO relationship (continuity, complexity, symmetry, and formality) and concepts that describe dimensions of such relationships (links, bonds, and ties). The results from the comparative study show that there are several similarities concerning interaction in relations between organizations in the two sectors. There are also differences depending on the level of analysis (empirical level vs. analytical level). The study shows the need to be explicit regarding organizational value, end-customer or client/citizen value and the type of objects that are exchanged in the interaction.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Berlin: Springer , 2010. p. 38-49
Series
Lecture Notes in Computer Science, ISSN 0302-9743, E-ISSN 1611-3349 ; 6228
Keywords [en]
B2B, G2G, interaction, e-government, inter-organizational, IOS
National Category
Information Systems
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-60085DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-14799-9_4ISBN: 978-3-642-14798-2 (print)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-60085DiVA, id: diva2:355020
Conference
9th IFIP WG 8.5 International Conference, EGOV 2010, Lausanne, Switzerland, August 29 - September 2, 2010
Available from: 2010-10-05 Created: 2010-10-05 Last updated: 2018-02-05

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(208 kB)725 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 208 kBChecksum SHA-512
5d00af81db5daf3b9f7c7cd02bbe770688dbeac2b7f10bc07182582654c9ec4f64817f98af517f742436ca4fc6e0d48230e45f4a5984f03bf9410188d2eaec59
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records

Melin, UlfAxelsson, Karin

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Melin, UlfAxelsson, Karin
By organisation
VITS - Development of Informations Systems and Work ContextFaculty of Arts and Sciences
Information Systems

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 725 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
isbn
urn-nbn
Total: 234 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf