liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Protein i korn: En torkstudie utförd med etablerade analysmetoder på tre kornsorter
Linköping University, Department of Physics, Chemistry and Biology.
2010 (Swedish)Independent thesis Basic level (degree of Bachelor), 10,5 credits / 16 HE creditsStudent thesisAlternative title
Protein in barley - A drying study performed with established analytical methods on three varieties of barley (English)
Abstract [en]

A study was performed to evaluate whether established methods of analysis of protein content in barley (Kjeldahl, Dumas, or NIT (short for Near Infrared Transmittance)) gives different results for wet and dried barley. This was carried out because there are concerns regarding the well-worn NIT prediction model giving different results for these conditions and that such an error causes significant price fluctuations on the market. By performing analyses of samples, both before and after drying, of the three different barley varieties Tipple, Prestige, and Quench, with all the techniques, data was obtained that could be analyzed statistically. The study showed that the NIT prediction model gives results for wet barley that is about 0.29 percentage points higher compared to dried barley. This difference was also statistically significant when a t-test was performed. The same difference was substantially smaller for Kjeldahl and Dumas and furthermore not statistically significant.

When the difference between the different barley varieties is studied a deviation of 0.34 percentage points was obtained for Tipple, 0.18 percentage points for Prestige, and 0.30 percentage points for Quench. NIT, thereby, gave results with greatest deviation when wet Tipple was analyzed. When t-tests were performed for each barley variety, it was found that results for all varieties differ significantly between wet and dry barley.

A study of the difference between the crude protein content determination by Kjeldahl and Dumas was also performed by calculating the mean differences between the various methods of determination. The average difference in crude protein determination was calculated to 0.07 percentage points.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2010. , 34 p.
Keyword [en]
Protein, barley, drying, Kjeldahl, Dumas, NIT
Keyword [sv]
Protein, korn, torkning, Kjeldahl, Dumas, NIT
National Category
Analytical Chemistry
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-60092ISRN: LITH-IFM-G-EX--10/2249--SEOAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-60092DiVA: diva2:355073
Presentation
2010-06-03, BL 32 (Nobel), Linköping, 14:10 (Swedish)
Uppsok
Physics, Chemistry, Mathematics
Supervisors
Examiners
Available from: 2010-10-06 Created: 2010-10-05 Last updated: 2010-10-06Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(964 kB)551 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 964 kBChecksum SHA-512
52fe021163029b68de0485c4b408485cc804cdf3dbbc0fe84bcffff9f750ebae83f81a947beacf13e2f2fc104f2c40bcf20afacf09347f6e201bd6907c89bd94
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Broberg, Mikael
By organisation
Department of Physics, Chemistry and Biology
Analytical Chemistry

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 551 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 256 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf