liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Ethical Challenges of Animal Biotechnology : Application of Ben Mepham's Ethical Matrix
Linköping University, Department of Culture and Communication, Centre for Applied Ethics. (Ethics)
2010 (English)Independent thesis Advanced level (degree of Master (One Year)), 10 credits / 15 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

This thesis examines whether animal biotechnology is compatible with the norms of animal welfare, environment, and public health. For this purpose, it explores two lines of ethical controversy — intrinsic argument and extrinsic argument. The intrinsic argument against biotechnology maintains that it is “objectionable in itself”. On the other hand, according to extrinsic argument animal biotechnology is ethically wrong because it has got negative consequences upon human beings, animals, and environment.  However, it is also true that biotechnology (whether animal or agricultural) is one of the means of our living today. We cannot deny or oppose its usefulness all on a sudden. We need to be careful as well as critical in this regard. Therefore, it is an imperative that we select tools for making better assessment of biotechnology. In order to examine the ethical acceptability of animal biotechnology, we need to assess the impact of this technology and its potential effects upon the four interest factors: (i) consumers, (ii) farmers and financiers, (iii) treated organisms, and (iv) environment. In this regard, I have opted for Mepham’s ethical matrix, which is a practical approach for addressing broader policy issues. I think that ethical matrix is such a theory that it can incorporate the demand of science and the multidimensional complexity of it that exists today. Mepham’s ethical matrix can lead one towards rational ethical analysis and weighing and integrating potentially conflicting values in the decision-making process. At the end of this study, I have focused on the application of Mepham’s ethical matrix upon some contexts of animal biotechnology, such as bST, transgenic animal, and xenotransplantation. Finally, through the analysis, I came to the conclusion that none of the ethical tools or theories can materially represent the problems to facilitate the ethical debate about animal biotechnology.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2010. , 38 p.
Keyword [en]
Animal Biotechnology, Ethical matrix, Intrinsic Argument, Extrinsic Argument, Justice
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-60923ISRN: LIU-CTE-AE-EX--09/06-SEOAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-60923DiVA: diva2:359860
Presentation
(English)
Uppsok
Humanities, Theology
Supervisors
Examiners
Available from: 2010-11-02 Created: 2010-11-01 Last updated: 2010-11-02Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(360 kB)2506 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 360 kBChecksum SHA-512
9ed2757b20c063fbf5f1b5a9987e5438b0c00e88aedf8b6e2ff6c04a54434a42d3319d38aea8e89851de562b622552f209c352bc8962a66c6a95e2eac4c0e23b
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
Centre for Applied Ethics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 2506 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 531 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf