liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Organisational Ability: Constituents and Congruencies
Linköping University, Department of Computer and Information Science, VITS - Development of Informations Systems and Work Context. Linköping University, The Institute of Technology.
Linköping University, Department of Computer and Information Science, VITS - Development of Informations Systems and Work Context. Linköping University, The Institute of Technology.
2002 (English)In: Organisational Ability: Constituents and Congruencies: The graffiti continues, Part 1 / [ed] Elayne Coakes, Dianne Willis, and Steve Clarke, London: Springer, 2002, 30-42 p.Chapter in book (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

During recent years there has been an upsurge of interest in knowledge management and organisational learning. But why focus on a subject that, at some level, has been around since the pre-Socratic philosophers? The answer to the question is manifold. One explanation is that knowledge and improvement of knowledge is considered to be crucial for the performance and development of organisations. It is also argued that in our contemporary society knowledge is an important asset in order to reach sustainable competitive advantage (see for example Drucker, 1993; Nonaka and Takeuchi, 1995; Quintas, Lefrere and Jones, 1997; Davenport and Prusak, 1998). One question of concern is what are the implications of seeing knowledge as an organisational asset? When comparing intangible assets, such as knowledge, with tangible assets, such as machines or land, they can hardly be treated as having the same properties. Another question is: how should we relate knowledge to the organisation’s total ability to perform actions and deliver value to its customers? Is knowledge the only constituent of organisational ability or are there other inherent parts? The purpose of this chapter is to investigate these questions and thereby develop the notion of organisational ability In order to do this the chapter begins by looking at some theories around the area of interest.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
London: Springer, 2002. 30-42 p.
Series
Computer supported cooperative work, ISSN 1431-1496
National Category
Engineering and Technology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-61105DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4471-0187-1_4ISBN: 1-85233-441-X (print)ISBN: 978-1-85233-441-3 (print)ISBN: 978-1-4471-0187-1 (print)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-61105DiVA: diva2:360481
Available from: 2010-11-03 Created: 2010-11-03 Last updated: 2016-09-01Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textläs utdragfind book at a swedish library/hitta boken i ett svenskt bibliotekfind book in another country/hitta boken i ett annat land

Authority records BETA

Goldkuhl, GöranBraf, Ewa

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Goldkuhl, GöranBraf, Ewa
By organisation
VITS - Development of Informations Systems and Work ContextThe Institute of Technology
Engineering and Technology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
isbn
urn-nbn
Total: 37 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf