liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Achieving Organizational Ambidexterity: Understanding and explaining ambidextrous organizations
Linköping University, Department of Management and Engineering.
Linköping University, Department of Management and Engineering.
2010 (English)Independent thesis Advanced level (degree of Master (Two Years)), 20 credits / 30 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

Background: Responding to fast technological and environmental changes brings about challenges and paradoxes for companies that should be resolved in order to survive long-term and to achieve a sustainable competitive advantage. Ambidexterity is considered a solution to organizational paradoxes.

Aim: The purpose of this research is to explore how firms can achieve ambidexterity to handle organizational paradoxes in different market conditions using their dynamic capabilities.

  • Definitions: Ambidexterity: The ability of organizations to handle adaptability and alignment, exploration and exploitation at the same time
  • Dynamic capabilities: The firm’s ability to integrate, build and reconfigure internal and external competencies to address rapidly changing environments
  • Exploration: Activities such as innovation, discovering new opportunities, variation
  • Exploitation: Activities that concern efficiency, implementation and execution

Results: There are possible options that companies can follow to achieveambidexterity. These sets of options are distinguished as external vs.internal, sequential vs. parallel, structural vs. contextual and the role ofsenior management behaviour. Depending on market dynamism andenvironmental conditions, a different set of options could be suitable fordifferent companies. In addition, companies can enhance the likelihoodof achieving ambidexterity using their dynamic capabilities.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2010. , 84 p.
Keyword [en]
Organizational Ambidexterity, Exploration & Exploitation, Organizational Paradoxes, Dynamic Capability, Market Dynamism, Organizational Change
National Category
Social Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-61262ISRN: LIU-IEI-FIL-A--10/00811--SEOAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-61262DiVA: diva2:361289
Uppsok
Social and Behavioural Science, Law
Supervisors
Available from: 2010-11-09 Created: 2010-11-09 Last updated: 2010-11-09Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1804 kB)5978 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1804 kBChecksum SHA-512
2e411979f86d5dc83a9e0e2e1ed6f2a88635a8f8e28d4fe0b1d0561c00a6e25e0550158749b25ae210613327fc0578bd260a5b521dcfd925df22477636ab581f
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
Department of Management and Engineering
Social Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 5978 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 3343 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf