liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
A Neo-Classical Structure for Scientific Publication and Reviewing
1997 (English)Rapport (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

I propose a neo-classical structure for publishing and reviewing of scientific works. This proposal has the following characteristic components:

  • Electronic “preprint archives” and other similar mechanisms where research articles are made publicly available without prior formal review are considered as true and full-fledged publication of research from the point of view of priority of results.
  • Large parts of the reviewing process is done publicly and in the form of published review letters and other contributions to the scientific debate, rather than through anonymous and confidential review statements which dominate today. There is a switch from anonymous “pass-fail” reviewing towards open reviewing where the identity and the comments of the reviewers are made public.
  • Since open reviewing happens after publication, rather than before, there is a second step where articles are promoted to “recommended” or “certified” status through the decision of a review committee. The requirements for certification are set at least as high as for the formally published journal articles of today, so that it counts like journal publication in a CV.
  • Several techniques are foreseen for facilitating the selection process of the individual reader as well as for improving communication as such between researchers.
  • One should accept that there are good reasons why there may be several articles (from the same author) presenting the same result. This suggests the introduction of a formal concept of a “result” which is represented by several publications, and to allow citations to refer to results rather than to some specific publication of the result.

I refer to this system as neo-classical because it assumes that peer review is done openly and after an article has been published. It is of course only proposed as a complement which can easily co-exist with the modern system, allowing each author to choose which of the two systems he or she wishes to use for a particular article.

Place, publisher, year, pages
Linköping: Linköping University Electronic Press, 1997. 28 p.
Series
Linköping Electronic Articles on Academic Policies and Trends, ISSN 1402-0319 (print), 1651-3304 (online) ; 1 Vol, 2
National Category
Social Sciences
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-61352 (URN)oai:DiVA.org:liu-61352 (OAI)
Available from1997-01-15 Created:2010-11-15 Last updated:2011-01-16Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(454 kB)126 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 454 kBChecksum SHA-512
5aca3355b0e2294cdab36fcb710cbb3b3b1075becf59ab158736cd303f4aaad47316b4155921be0bfdbbbb1b78ca8a80571f018c9b9be2b7a495f40281a951d2
Typ fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Sandewall, Erik
By organisation
CASL - Cognitive Autonomous Systems LaboratoryThe Institute of Technology
Social Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Totalt: 126 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available
Totalt: 54 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link