liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Complexity of program and clinical outcomes of heart failure disease management incorporating specialist nurse-led heart failure clinics. A meta-regression analysis.
2005 (English)In: European Journal of Heart Failure, ISSN 1388-9842, E-ISSN 1879-0844, Vol. 7, no 3, 333-41 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether a hierarchy of effectiveness exists with respect to complexity of published protocols of heart failure (HF) disease management (DM) incorporating specialist nurse-led HF clinics. DATA SOURCES AND STUDY SELECTION: We searched MEDLINE (1966-November 2004), the Cochrane Library, article bibliographies, and contacted experts. Inclusion criteria were random allocation of at least 100 patients, specialist HF nurses, HF clinics, and readmission as an outcome measure. DATA EXTRACTION: Paired reviewers conducted quality assessment, deconstructed and categorized protocols by complexity, and extracted results for readmission, mortality, the combined endpoint of mortality and hospitalization, HF readmission, and hospital days utilized. DATA SYNTHESIS: Six trials were selected (N=949, mean age 73 years [range 62-79], men 58%, LVEF 34% [27-41], and average follow-up of 8.5 months [3-12]). Compared with usual care, the overall relative risk [95% confidence interval] for readmission with this strategy was 0.91 [0.72, 1.16], mortality was 0.80 [0.57, 1.06], and the combined endpoint of mortality and hospitalization was 0.88 [0.74, 1.04]. We observed better outcomes for programs with versus programs without hospital discharge planning and immediate post-discharge follow-up; readmission 0.30 [0.04, 2.60] vs. 1.00 [0.86, 1.17], mortality 0.96 [0.63, 1.47] vs. 0.75 [0.55, 1.03], the combined endpoint of mortality and hospitalization 0.61 [0.18, 2.02] vs. 0.91 [0.80, 1.03], HF readmission 0.09 [0.10, 0.65] vs. 0.65 [0.43, 1.00], and hospitalized days utilized per patient -0.26 [-0.49,-0.02] vs. 0.09 [-1.17, 1.34]. CONCLUSIONS: HF DM with specialist nurse-led HF clinics is a promising strategy or effective alternative whose benefit may be optimized by programs with a homogeneous structure and components that are delivered with consistency.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2005. Vol. 7, no 3, 333-41 p.
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-62485DOI: 10.1016/j.ejheart.2005.01.011PubMedID: 15718173OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-62485DiVA: diva2:373260
Available from: 2010-11-30 Created: 2010-11-30 Last updated: 2017-12-12

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed
In the same journal
European Journal of Heart Failure

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 20 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • oxford
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf