liu.seSearch for publications in DiVA
Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Continuous and dichotomous outcomes in studies of psychotherapy for adult depression: A meta-analytic comparison
Vrije University Amsterdam.
Vrije University Amsterdam.
Vanderbilt University.
Linköping University, Department of Behavioural Sciences and Learning, Clinical and Social Psychology. Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4753-6745
2010 (English)In: JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, ISSN 0165-0327, Vol. 126, no 3, 349-357 p.Article, review/survey (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background: In treatment research on depressive disorders, outcomes can be based on continuous outcomes but also on dichotomous outcomes. Although it is possible to convert the two types of outcomes to each other, it has not been tested whether this results in systematic differences. Method: We selected studies on psychotherapy for adult depression from an existing database, in which both continuous and dichotomous outcomes were presented. We calculated effect sizes using both types of outcomes, and compared the results. Results: Although there were considerable differences between the two types of outcomes in individual studies, both types of outcomes resulted in very similar pooled effect sizes. The pooled effect size based on the continuous outcome were somewhat more conservative (d = 0.59: OR = 2.92) than the one based on the dichotomous outcome (d = 0.64; OR = 3.17). Heterogeneity was higher in the analyses based on the continuous outcomes than in those based on the dichotomous outcomes. Sensitivity analyses and subgroup analyses confirmed that the pooled effect sizes were very similar, that the effect sizes were somewhat smaller when the continuous outcomes are used, and that heterogeneity was higher in the analyses based on the continuous outcomes. Conclusion: Overall, the two types of outcomes result in comparable pooled effect sizes and can both be used in meta-analyses. However, the results of the two types of outcomes should not be used interchangeably, because there may be systematic differences in heterogeneity and subgroup analyses.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam. , 2010. Vol. 126, no 3, 349-357 p.
Keyword [en]
Depression, Major depressive disorder, Meta-analysis, Psychotherapy, Outcome measures, Psychological treatment
National Category
Social Sciences
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-62735DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2010.01.001ISI: 000283901300002OAI: diva2:374225
Available from: 2010-12-03 Created: 2010-12-03 Last updated: 2014-11-28

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Andersson, Gerhard
By organisation
Clinical and Social PsychologyFaculty of Arts and Sciences
Social Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 28 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link