Contextualism, assessor relativism, and insensitive assessments
2009 (English)In: Logique et Analyse, ISSN 0024-5836, Vol. 52, no 208, 363-372 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Recently, contextualism about epistemic modals and predicates of taste have come under fire from advocates of assessment relativistic analyses. Contextualism, they have argued, fails to account for what we call "felicitous insensitive assessments". In this paper, we provide one hitherto overlooked way in which contextualists can embrace the phenomenon by slightly modifying an assumption that has remained in the background in most of the debate over contextualism and relativism. Finally, we briefly argue that the resulting contextualist account is at least as plausible as the relativist alternative and should be carefully considered before contextualism is abandoned for relativism.
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Nationaal Centrum voor Navorsingen in de Logica , 2009. Vol. 52, no 208, 363-372 p.
contextualism, relativism, epistemic modals, taste, John MacFarlane, Andy Egan
IdentifiersURN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-63440OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-63440DiVA: diva2:379598
ProjectsDisagreement, objectivity, and insensitive assessments